...
首页> 外文期刊>Footwear science >Methods for assessing footwear comfort: a systematic review
【24h】

Methods for assessing footwear comfort: a systematic review

机译:评估鞋类安慰的方法:系统评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Perceived footwear comfort influences wearability and can impact on physical mobility, performance and foot-related complaints. To date, there has been no comprehensive review of the characteristics or methods for measuring perceived footwear comfort. The aims of this systematic review were to identify, appraise and synthesise the literature on methods used to assess perceived footwear comfort, and report their validity and reliability. Electronic databases were systematically searched and the articles screened and appraised for methodological risk of bias using a modified Quality Index checklist. Data on footwear comfort assessment tools (methods, populations, footwear types, reliability/validity) was extracted by two reviewers. A narrative synthesis was undertaken to describe the findings. Ninety-nine articles involving 6980 participants were assessed as eligible for review. Perceived footwear comfort has been assessed by a variety of methods including the visual analogue scale (VAS), Likert-type scales, ranking scales and questionnaires. The studies have covered a range of populations, both healthy and pathological, ranging between ages 8 and 75 years, most commonly adults. Investigations into reliability of perceived footwear comfort scales were limited, and whilst some tools had evidence of moderate to high reliability, findings were population dependent. Developmental or independent validity testing was typically not undertaken. Risk of bias was variable across studies. Perceived footwear comfort assessment has been performed across a wide range of populations and footwear types. Whilst select measures had evidence for their reliability, the results were variable and population dependent. There is scope for further research into the reliability and validity of perceived footwear comfort assessment tools in different populations.
机译:感知鞋类舒适性影响耐磨性,会影响物理流动性,性能和足够的足够诉讼。迄今为止,没有全面审查测量感知鞋类舒适度的特点或方法。该系统审查的目的是识别,评估和综合用于评估感知鞋类舒适的方法的文献,并报告其有效性和可靠性。系统地搜索电子数据库以及使用修改的质量指数清单筛选和评估偏置的方法的风险。两位审稿人提取有关鞋类舒适评估工具(方法,人群,鞋类类型,可靠性/有效性)的数据。进行了叙事综合来描述调查结果。涉及6980名参与者的九十九篇文章被评估为符合审查条件。通过各种方法评估了感知鞋类舒适度,包括视觉模拟量表(VAS),Likert型尺度,排名尺度和问卷调查。这些研究涵盖了一系列群体,健康和病理,在8至75岁之间,最常见的成年人。对感知鞋类舒适尺度的可靠性进行调查是有限的,并且一些工具有中等至高可靠性的证据,而调查结果依赖于群体。发展或独立有效性测试通常没有进行。偏见的风险在研究方面是可变的。感知鞋类舒适评估已经涉及各种人口和鞋类类型。虽然选择措施具有可靠性的证据,但结果是可变的,种群依赖。进一步研究不同人群的感知鞋类舒适评估工具的可靠性和有效性的范围。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Footwear science》 |2021年第3期|255-274|共20页
  • 作者单位

    Allied Health & Human Performance University of South Australia Adelaide Australia;

    Allied Health & Human Performance University of South Australia Adelaide Australia;

    Allied Health & Human Performance University of South Australia Adelaide Australia;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Shoes; footwear; rating; tool; evaluation;

    机译:鞋;鞋子;评分;工具;评估;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号