首页> 外文期刊>Flow, Turbulence and Combustion >Subgrid Scale Modeling in Large-Eddy Simulation of Turbulent Combustion Using Premixed Flamelet Chemistry
【24h】

Subgrid Scale Modeling in Large-Eddy Simulation of Turbulent Combustion Using Premixed Flamelet Chemistry

机译:预混合小火焰化学在大涡模拟湍流燃烧中的亚网格尺度建模

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Large-eddy simulation (LES) of turbulent combustion with premixed flamelets is investigated in this paper. The approach solves the filtered Navier–Stokes equations supplemented with two transport equations, one for the mixture fraction and another for a progress variable. The LES premixed flamelet approach is tested for two flows: a premixed preheated Bunsen flame and a partially premixed diffusion flame (Sandia Flame D). In the first case, we compare the LES with a direct numerical simulation (DNS). Four non-trivial models for the chemical source term are considered for the Bunsen flame: the standard presumed beta-pdf model, and three new propositions (simpler than the beta-pdf model): the filtered flamelet model, the shift-filter model and the shift-inversion model. A priori and a posteriori tests are performed for these subgrid reaction models. In the present preheated Bunsen flame, the filtered flamelet model gives the best results in a priori tests. The LES tests for the Bunsen flame are limited to a case in which the filter width is only slightly larger than the flame thickness. According to the a posteriori tests the three models (beta-pdf, filtered flamelet and shift-inversion) show more or less the same results as the trivial model, in which subgrid reaction effects are ignored, while the shift-filter model leads to worse results. Since LES needs to resolve the large turbulent eddies, the LES filter width is bounded by a maximum. For the present Bunsen flame this means that the filter width should be of the order of the flame thickness or smaller. In this regime, the effects of subgrid reaction and subgrid flame wrinkling turn out to be quite modest. The LES-results of the second case (Sandia Flame D) are compared to experimental data. Satisfactory agreement is obtained for the main species. Comparison is made between different eddy-viscosity models for the subgrid turbulence, and the Smagorinsky eddy-viscosity is found to give worse results than eddy-viscosities that are not dominated by the mean shear.
机译:研究了带有预混小火焰的湍流燃烧的大涡模拟(LES)。该方法解决了过滤后的Navier–Stokes方程,并补充了两个输运方程,一个用于混合分数,另一个用于进度变量。对LES预混小火焰方法的两种流动进行了测试:预混预热的本生火焰和部分预混扩散火焰(Sandia Flame D)。在第一种情况下,我们将LES与直接数值模拟(DNS)进行比较。本生火焰考虑了四种化学来源术语的非平凡模型:标准假定的beta-pdf模型,以及三个新的命题(比beta-pdf模型简单):过滤的小火焰模型,移位过滤器模型和移位反转模型。对这些亚电网反应模型进行先验和后验测试。在当前的预热本生火焰中,过滤后的小火焰模型在先验测试中给出了最佳结果。本生火焰的LES测试仅限于过滤器宽度仅略大于火焰厚度的情况。根据后验测试,这三个模型(beta-pdf,过滤的小火焰和移位反转)显示出与平凡模型大致相同的结果,其中忽略了次网格反应效应,而移位过滤器模型导致更差的结果结果。由于LES需要解决较大的湍流涡流,因此LES过滤器的宽度受最大值限制。对于当前的本生火焰,这意味着过滤器的宽度应为火焰厚度或更小的数量级。在这种情况下,亚网格反应和亚网格火焰起皱的影响被证明是相当适度的。将第二例(Sandia Flame D)的LES结果与实验数据进行比较。对于主要物种获得了满意的协议。对亚网格湍流的不同涡流粘度模型进行了比较,发现Smagorinsky涡流粘度的结果要比不受平均剪切力支配的涡流粘度差。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Flow, Turbulence and Combustion》 |2009年第4期|511-535|共25页
  • 作者单位

    Combustion Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering Technische Universiteit Eindhoven Den Dolech 2 5600 MB Eindhoven The Netherlands;

    Combustion Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering Technische Universiteit Eindhoven Den Dolech 2 5600 MB Eindhoven The Netherlands;

    Combustion Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering Technische Universiteit Eindhoven Den Dolech 2 5600 MB Eindhoven The Netherlands;

    Combustion Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering Technische Universiteit Eindhoven Den Dolech 2 5600 MB Eindhoven The Netherlands;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Turbulent combustion; Premixed flamelets; Large-eddy simulation; Subgrid modeling;

    机译:湍流燃烧;预混小火焰;大涡模拟;子网格建模;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号