...
首页> 外文期刊>Fire Safety Journal >Critical evaluation of an integral model for the pyrolysis of charring materials
【24h】

Critical evaluation of an integral model for the pyrolysis of charring materials

机译:对炭化材料热解积分模型的严格评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

When field models are used to predict fires and flame spread, a solid model is required to calculate the amount of released pyrolysis gases. Here, the integral model for the pyrolysis of charring materials of Moghtaderi et al., extended with a cooling stage is considered. When an incident heat flux measured during a flame spread experiment, is imposed to the solid, the cooling stage is shown to be indispensable to solve the pyrolysis process. Next, the integral model is compared with a moving grid model. The latter uses the same physical model but does not make any assumption on the temperature profile and thus gives the true solution of the physical model. Comparison of both models reveals that the integral model has problems with suddenly varying boundary conditions and produces erroneous results for parameter studies on thickness and rear boundary condition variations. However, when compared to inert pyrolysis experiments, the integral and the moving grid model are comparable in quality. An automatic optimisation technique is described to obtain material fire properties.
机译:当使用现场模型来预测火灾和火焰蔓延时,需要使用实体模型来计算释放的热解气体的量。在此,考虑了Moghtaderi等人的炭化材料的热解的整体模型,该模型具有冷却阶段。当在火焰扩散实验中测得的入射热通量施加到固体上时,冷却阶段对于解决热解过程必不可少。接下来,将积分模型与移动网格模型进行比较。后者使用相同的物理模型,但不对温度曲线进行任何假设,因此可以给出物理模型的真实解。两种模型的比较表明,积分模型存在边界条件突然变化的问题,并且对于厚度和后边界条件变化的参数研究产生了错误的结果。但是,与惰性热解实验相比,积分模型和移动网格模型的质量可比。描述了一种自动优化技术,以获得材料着火性能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号