...
首页> 外文期刊>Fire Engineers Journal >Is it Time to Abandon CO_2 as an Approved Engine Room Fixed Firefighting System?
【24h】

Is it Time to Abandon CO_2 as an Approved Engine Room Fixed Firefighting System?

机译:现在该放弃CO_2作为批准的机舱固定式灭火系统了吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Carbon dioxide has served us well over many years, but has the significant drawback in that it is understandably viewed as a system of last resort by most mariners. Undoubtedly, CO_2 will remain the system of choice for the protection of cargo holds. However, the advances in fire safety engineering in the author's lifetime as a firefighter and fire preventionist now provide the marine community with improved water based systems -systems of first resort, which do not place a Master in the unenviable position of saving the ship but sacrificing crew trapped in a machinery space protected by CO_2. At the time of writing this article, yet another machinery space fire resulted in over 1,167 passengers abandoning the Princesse Ragnhild, in "flat calm". At this point the firefighting measures taken by the crew are not known.
机译:二氧化碳多年来一直为我们服务,但有一个重大缺点,那就是大多数船员都可以将二氧化碳视为万不得已的系统。毫无疑问,CO_2仍将是保护货舱的首选系统。但是,作者作为消防员和消防员一生中消防安全工程学的进步现在为海洋社区提供了改进的水基系统-首选系统,这不会使船长处于拯救船舶的令人羡慕的地位,但却牺牲了机组人员被困在受CO_2保护的机器空间中。在撰写本文时,又发生了一起机器太空大火,导致1,167多名乘客“平淡无奇”地抛弃了拉格希尔德公主。目前尚不清楚机组人员采取的消防措施。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号