...
首页> 外文期刊>Fine woodworking >Sand, Scrape, or Plane?
【24h】

Sand, Scrape, or Plane?

机译:沙,刮或平面?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Perhaps more than most woodworking topics, debates on surface preparation elicit strong opinions. No doubt handplaning takes more finesse and practice than sanding, and pushing out fluffy shavings with a card scraper takes practice. But which method produces the best surface for applying a finish? When I started woodworking, I took a class on surface preparation. I remember the awe I felt as the instructor, with a few swipes of a well-worn Stanley No. 4 handplane, revealed the fire inside a piece of cherry—a staggering contrast to the slightly chalky, sanded surfaces I was used to. I was sold, and quickly bought a very used No. 6—in retrospect, a bit overenthusiastic for a starter plane.
机译:关于表面处理的辩论也许比大多数木工主题还重要。毫无疑问,手工刨比打磨需要更多的技巧和实践,而用刮板器刮出蓬松的刨花则需要实践。但是,哪种方法可以产生最佳的表面涂层?当我开始木工时,我参加了表面处理课程。我还记得当老师时感到敬畏的感觉,用一副破旧的Stanley 4号手推板轻扫一下,露出了一块樱桃里面的火-与我习惯的略带粉笔,砂光的表面形成了惊人的对比。我被卖掉了,很快就买了一个非常二手的6号车,回想起来,对于入门飞机来说有点太热情了。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号