首页> 外文期刊>Explorations in economic history >Conflict and compromise: Changes in U.S. strike outcomes, 1880 to 1945
【24h】

Conflict and compromise: Changes in U.S. strike outcomes, 1880 to 1945

机译:冲突与妥协:1880年至1945年美国罢工结果的变化

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Before about 1900, most strikes in the United States were either won or lost by the workers who called them. Relatively few strikes ended in any sort of compromise. Sometime during the last decade of the 19th century, however, the pattern begins to change, with the fraction of strikes ending in compromise peaking at nearly half during World Wars I and 11. What explains these changes in strike outcomes between the late 19th century and 1945? We explore the effects of macroeconomic conditions, industrial organization and product markets, labor organization, law and public policy, and immigration and trade on the costs and benefits of achieving strike compromises. We find that temporary government intervention in settling strikes during World War 1 helped move labor and management away from an adversarial equilibrium, and thus allowed growing acceptance of organized labor to be reflected in a permanent increase in the rate of compromise. We conclude that changes in the nature of strike outcomes represent an important and neglected aspect of broader changes in the place of organized labor in the American political economy.
机译:大约在1900年之前,美国大多数罢工是由打罢工的工人赢了还是输了。很少有罢工以任何形式的妥协而告终。但是,在19世纪最后十年的某个时候,这种模式开始发生变化,在第一次世界大战和第11届世界大战期间,罢工的比例以妥协告终,几乎达到一半,达到峰值。这解释了19世纪末期和2007年末罢工成果的这些变化1945年?我们探讨了宏观经济条件,产业组织和产品市场,劳工组织,法律和公共政策以及移民和贸易对达成罢工妥协的成本和收益的影响。我们发现,在第一次世界大战期间,政府对罢工的临时干预有助于将劳动力和管理从对抗性平衡中移开,从而使对有组织劳动的日益接受反映在妥协率的永久提高中。我们得出的结论是,罢工结果性质的变化代表了美国政治经济中有组织的劳动场所的广泛变化的一个重要而被忽视的方面。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号