...
首页> 外文期刊>Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology >Ebastine fast-dissolving tablets versus regular tablets: acceptability and preference in patients with allergic rhinitis
【24h】

Ebastine fast-dissolving tablets versus regular tablets: acceptability and preference in patients with allergic rhinitis

机译:依巴斯汀速溶片与常规片:过敏性鼻炎患者的可接受性和偏爱性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

A new fast-dissolving tablet (FDT) formulation of ebastine has been developed that dissolves rapidly in the mouth without the need for water. This new formulation of ebastine FDT offers an opportunity to tailor prescribing in a way that meets patient’s preferences. The aim of the reported study was to evaluate the preferences of allergic rhinitis patients who were given either a placebo version of ebastine FDT or a placebo version of ebastine regular tablet (RT). Allergic rhinitis patients from Germany, Italy and Mexico, who were regular consumers of oral antihistamines, were recruited to a randomized, crossover study comparing placebo forms of ebastine FDT and ebastine RT. Patients were interviewed at home and were given both a FDT and RT (10 and 20 mg doses were used with a 1:1 ratio). Data on patient preferences were recorded by an interviewer and analyzed using descriptive statistics. A total of 420 individuals participated (140 in each country), 70% with intermittent and 24% with persistent allergic rhinitis. Using a rating scale of 0–10 and comparing mean values, ebastine FDT was statistically significantly better than RT for: sensation on dissolving (8.30 FDT vs 6.79 RT); taste it leaves in the mouth (8.10 FDT vs 6.60 RT); initial taste (8.07 FDT vs 6.63 RT); and texture (7.85 FDT vs 7.20 RT). Rapidity of dissolution was rated 8.67 for FDT. With the same scale, RT rated statistically significantly better than ebastine FDT for: appearance (7.46 RT vs 6.85 FDT); size (7.38 RT vs 7.06 FDT); and shape (7.55 RT vs 7.24 FDT). General evaluation was statistically significantly better for ebastine FDT (8.21 FDT vs 7.05 RT). Overall, 83% of patients preferred ebastine FDT to RT, 92% considered it to be more innovative, 90% that it was suitable to be taken without water and that it was technologically advanced, and 87% that it was suitable for taking at any time and anywhere, and that it had a refreshing taste. Ebastine FDT formulation is preferred to the RT by the majority of allergic rhinitis patients, rating most highly for dissolution, taste and texture.
机译:已经开发出一种新的依巴斯汀速溶片剂(FDT)配方,无需水即可在口腔中快速溶解。依巴斯汀FDT的这种新配方为根据患者的喜好量身定制处方提供了机会。所报道研究的目的是评估接受安慰剂版本的依巴斯汀FDT或安慰剂版本的依巴斯汀常规片剂(RT)的过敏性鼻炎患者的偏好。经常口服口服抗组胺药的德国,意大利和墨西哥的过敏性鼻炎患者被纳入一项随机,交叉研究,比较安慰剂形式的依巴斯汀FDT和依巴斯汀RT。患者在家中接受采访,并接受FDT和RT治疗(分别以1:1的比例使用10和20 mg剂量)。访调员记录有关患者偏爱的数据,并使用描述性统计数据进行分析。共有420人参加(每个国家140人),其中70%为间歇性和24%为持续性过敏性鼻炎。使用0-10的评分量表并比较平均值,依巴斯汀FDT在统计学上显着优于RT,其用于:溶解感(8.30 FDT与6.79 RT);闻起来留在嘴里(8.10 FDT与6.60 RT);初始口味(8.07 FDT与6.63 RT);和质地(7.85 FDT与7.20 RT)。 FDT的溶解速度定为8.67。在相同的比例下,RT在外观上在统计学上显着优于ebastine FDT:(7.46 RT vs 6.85 FDT);尺寸(7.38 RT vs 7.06 FDT);和形状(7.55 RT和7.24 FDT)。依巴斯汀FDT的一般评估在统计学上明显更好(8.21 FDT vs 7.05 RT)。总体而言,有83%的患者更喜欢依巴斯汀FDT而不是RT; 92%的患者认为它更具创新性; 90%的患者适合不用水服用并且技术先进; 87%的患者适合在任何情况下服用时间和任何地方,它都有令人耳目一新的味道。对于大多数过敏性鼻炎患者,依巴斯汀FDT制剂在RT方面是首选,在溶出度,味道和质地方面评分最高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号