首页> 外文期刊>Experimental Heat Transfer >Exergy analysis of two novel all-welded plate air preheaters
【24h】

Exergy analysis of two novel all-welded plate air preheaters

机译:对两种新型全焊接板空气预热器进行的暴露分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

With the stricter requirements for energy saving and emission reduction, air preheaters have always been the focus of scientific research, especially the development of plate air preheaters with high compactness, good heat transfer performance and reduced media flow pressure has a sharp upward trend. At present, there are two kinds of plate type air preheaters on the market, one is popular in the market for welding support points between plates, or the Stubs-inserted Plate Air preheater (SIPA); the other is the Corrugated Plate Air preheater (CPA). In order to evaluate the thermodynamic performance of the two series of air preheaters, this paper analyzes the exergy loss of the CPA and SIPA through experimental research. Experiments were conducted where environmental air was heated by high-temperature flue gas produced from the burning of natural gas. Variations in the effectiveness and dimensionless exergy losses of the air preheaters according to gas flow rates are compared. The temperatures of the inlet air and flue gas were kept constant at 30 degrees C and 300 degrees C, respectively. The Reynolds numbers varied from 2.95 x 10(3) to 5.47 x 10(3) for air and 2.01 x 10(3) to 3.14 x 10(3) for flue gas. The experimental results show that the number of heat transfer units and the effectiveness of the CPA were much higher than those of the SIPA under the same conditions. The maximum and minimum values for the CPA were 0.564 and 0.438, respectively, and were 0.337 and 0.232 for the SIPA. Simultaneously, the exergy losses of both air preheaters increased with increases in gas flow. The CPA had a higher value than the SIPA but smaller dimensionless exergy losses under the same conditions, which indicates that the SIPA had greater irreversibility than the CPA at the same heat transfer rate. In consideration of its thermodynamic characteristics, the heat transfer performance of the CPA is superior to that of the SIPA.
机译:随着对节能减排的更严格的要求,空气预热器始终是科学研究的重点,特别是板空气预热器的开发高紧凑,良好的传热性能和减少介质流量的趋势较大。目前,市场上有两种板式空气预热器,一个在市场上焊接支撑点的市场,或者插入板空气预热器(SIPA);另一个是波纹板空气预热器(CPA)。为了评估两系列空气预热器的热力学性能,本文通过实验研究分析了CPA和SIPA的漏洞。进行实验,其中通过由天然气燃烧的高温烟道气加热环境空气。比较了根据气体流速的空气预热器的有效性和无量纲损失的变化。入口空气和烟道气的温度分别在30℃和300℃下保持恒定。 Reynolds的数量从2.95×10(3)到5.47×10(3)变化,空气和2.01 x 10(3)至3.14×10(3)烟气。实验结果表明,在相同条件下,传热单元数量和CPA的有效性远高于SIPA的数量。 CPA的最大值和最小值分别为0.564和0.438,SIPA为0.337和0.232。同时,两种空气预热器的损失随着气流的增加而增加。 CPA的值高于SIPA,但在相同条件下的较小无量度不能损失,这表明SIPA与同一传热速率的CPA具有更大的不可逆转性。考虑到其热力学特性,CPA的传热性能优于SIPA的传热性能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号