首页> 外文期刊>Experimental Heat Transfer >Experimental comparison of Triton X-100 and sodium dodecyl benzene sulfonate surfactants on thermal performance of TiO_2-deionized water nanofluid in a thermosiphon
【24h】

Experimental comparison of Triton X-100 and sodium dodecyl benzene sulfonate surfactants on thermal performance of TiO_2-deionized water nanofluid in a thermosiphon

机译:Triton X-100和十二烷基苯磺酸钠表面活性剂在热虹吸管中对TiO_2去离子水纳米流体的热性能的实验比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This study investigates how TiO2/deionized water nanofluids affect the thermal performance of a two-phase closed thermosiphon (TPCT) at various states of operation, according to the surfactant types. A straight copper tube with an inner diameter of 13mm, outer diameter of 15mm, and length of 1m was used as the TPCT, i.e., heat pipe. The nanofluid utilizing in experiments was prepared by mixing the TiO2 nano-particles at the rate of 1.3% and a surfactant at the rate of 0.5% with deionized water. The surfactants used for lowering the surface tension give rise to prevent the flocculation in nanofluids. In order to see the influences of the surfactants on the nanofluid properties, two types surfactants, Triton X-100 and sodium dodecyl benzene sulfonate (SDBS), were selected as nonionic and ionic surfactants and used in this study. The nanofluid was charged with in the ratio of 33.3% (equals to 44.2ml) of the volume of the TPCT. To be able to make experimental comparisons, three different working fluids prepared under the same conditions in the same heat pipe were tested at three different heating powers (200, 300, and 400W) and three different coolant water flow rates (5, 7.5, and 10g/s). The experiments were conducted for both TiO2 and Triton X 100-deionized water nanofluid and TiO2 and SDBS-deionized water nanofluid. The findings obtained from the tests were also compared to each other for showing off to what extent a surfactant affects the nanofluid properties. The maximum improvement in the thermal resistance was achieved by 43.26% in the experiment realized at 200W input power and 7.5g/s cooling water mass flow rate, in which the working fluid is TiO2 and SDBS-deionized water nanofluid.
机译:这项研究根据表面活性剂的类型,研究了TiO2 /去离子水纳米流体如何在各种操作状态下影响两相闭式热虹吸管(TPCT)的热性能。 TPCT使用的是直管,其内径为13mm,外径为15mm,长度为1m,即热管。通过将去离子水以1.3%的比例混合TiO2纳米颗粒和以0.5%的比例混合表面活性剂来制备用于实验的纳米流体。用于降低表面张力的表面活性剂产生以防止纳米流体中的絮凝。为了了解表面活性剂对纳米流体性能的影响,本研究选择了两种类型的表面活性剂Triton X-100和十二烷基苯磺酸钠(SDBS)作为非离子和离子表面活性剂。纳米流体的电荷量为TPCT体积的33.3%(等于44.2ml)。为了能够进行实验比较,在三种不同的加热功率(200、300和400W)和三种不同的冷却水流量(5、7.5和3.0)下,对在同一条热管中在相同条件下制备的三种不同工作流体进行了测试。 10g / s)。对TiO2和Triton X 100去离子水纳米流体以及TiO2和SDBS去离子水纳米流体进行了实验。还比较了从测试中获得的发现,以证明表面活性剂在多大程度上影响纳米流体的性能。在工作功率为TiO2和SDBS去离子水纳米流体的200W输入功率和7.5g / s冷却水质量流量的实验中,热阻的最大改善达到了43.26%。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号