首页> 外文期刊>Evolutionary Biology >Evolutionary Relationships Among Robust and Gracile Australopiths: An “Evo-devo” Perspective
【24h】

Evolutionary Relationships Among Robust and Gracile Australopiths: An “Evo-devo” Perspective

机译:健壮和敏捷的澳大利亚人之间的进化关系:“进化”的观点

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Hominin fossils of gracile and robust australopith groups were found both in East and in South Africa. It is unclear, however, whether all robusts belong to a monophyletic Paranthropus clade, as the craniofacial resemblance among robust australopiths might only be a superficial correlate of similar masticatory adaptations and not evidence of shared ancestry. It has been suggested that the East African Australopithecus/Paranthropus boisei and the South African A./P. robustus might be convergent allometric variants of their gracile geographical neighbors A. afarensis and A. africanus. Here we approach the phylogenetic questions about robust and gracile australopiths from an “evo-devo” perspective, examining how simple alterations of development could contribute to the shape differences among hominin species. Using geometric morphometrics we compare gracile and robust australopith crania in the context of the allometric scaling patterns of Pan troglodytes, P. paniscus, and Gorilla gorilla. We examine support for two alternative evolutionary scenarios based on predictions derived from quantitative genetics models: either (1) A./P. robustus evolved in South Africa from the gracile A. africanus, or (2) A./P. robustus is a local variant of the eastern African A./P. boisei. We use developmental simulations to demonstrate that some robust characteristics (wide faces, anteriorly placed zygomatics, and facial dishing) can be predicted by allometric scaling along the ontogenetic trajectory of the gracile A. africanus. We find, however, that the facial differences between A. africanus specimens (Taung, Sts 5, Sts 71, and Stw 505) and A./P. robustus specimen SK 48 cannot be explained by allometric scaling alone. Facial shape differences between A./P. robustus SK 48 and A./P. boisei (KNM-ER 732, KNM-ER 406, OH 5) and the A./P. aethiopicus specimen KNM-WT 17000, on the other hand, can largely be explained by allometric scaling. This is consistent with a close evolutionary relationship of these robust taxa.
机译:在东部和南非都发现了脆弱的和坚固的南澳人猿的化石化石。然而,尚不清楚是否所有的健壮体都属于单生的旁支进化枝,因为健壮的南极的颅面相似可能只是相似咀嚼适应的表面关联,而不是共同血统的证据。有人建议东非南方古猿/ Paranthropus boisei和南非A./P。鲁棒属可能是它们脆弱的地理邻居A. afarensis和A. africanus的趋同异构变体。在这里,我们从“进化论”的角度探讨了关于健壮和柔韧的南方古猿的系统发育问题,研究了简单的发育变化如何导致人参素物种之间的形状差异。使用几何形态计量学,我们在泛穴居人,P。paniscus和大猩猩大猩猩的异形缩放比例模式下比较了脆弱的和健壮的南极澳cr。我们基于定量遗传学模型得出的预测来检验对两种替代进化方案的支持:(1)A./P。鲁棒杆菌在南非由纤毛的非洲非洲杆菌(A./P。健壮性是东非A./P。的本地变种。博伊西。我们使用发展模拟来证明可以通过沿非洲细角非洲蝗虫的发育轨迹进行异速生长缩放来预测一些健壮的特征(宽脸、,骨和面部凹陷)。但是,我们发现非洲非洲曲霉标本(Taung,Sts 5,Sts 71和Stw 505)和A./P之间的面部差异。坚固的标本SK 48不能仅通过异速缩放来解释。 A./P。之间的面部形状差异健壮的SK 48和A./P。 Boisei(KNM-ER 732,KNM-ER 406,OH 5)和A./P。另一方面,aethiopicus标本KNM-WT 17000可以通过异度缩放来解释。这与这些稳健的分类单元的紧密进化关系一致。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号