首页> 外文期刊>Evaluation review >Socioeconomic Impact Assessment in Ex Ante Evaluations: A Case Study on the Rural Development Programs of the European Union
【24h】

Socioeconomic Impact Assessment in Ex Ante Evaluations: A Case Study on the Rural Development Programs of the European Union

机译:事前评估中的社会经济影响评估:以欧洲联盟农村发展计划为例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Background: Ex ante impact assessment has become a fundamental tool for effective program management, and thus, a compulsory task when establishing a new program in the European Union (EU). Objective: This article aims to analyze benefits from ex ante impact assessment, methodologies followed, and difficulties encountered. This is done through the case study on the rural development programs (RDPs) in the EU. Results regarding methodologies are then contrasted with the international context in order to provide solid insights to evaluators and program managing authorities facing ex ante impact assessment. Research design: All European RDPs from the period 2007 through 2013 (a total of 88) and their corresponding available ex ante evaluations (a total of 70) were analyzed focusing on the socioeconomic impact assessment. Results: Only 46.6% of the regions provide quantified impact estimations on socioeconomic impacts in spite of it being a compulsory task demanded by the European Commission (EC). Recommended methods by the EC are mostly used, but there is a lack of mixed method approaches since qualitative methods are used in substitution of quantitative ones. Two main difficulties argued were the complexity of program impacts and the lack of needed program information. Conclusions: Qualitative approaches on their own have been found as not suitable for ex ante impact assessment, while quantitative approaches-such as microsimulation models-provide a good approximation to actual impacts. However, time and budgetary constraints make that quantitative and mixed methods should be mainly applied on the most relevant impacts for the program success.
机译:背景:事前影响评估已成为有效计划管理的基本工具,因此,在欧洲联盟(EU)建立新计划时,这是一项强制性任务。目标:本文旨在分析事前影响评估的好处,遵循的方法和遇到的困难。这是通过对欧盟农村发展计划(RDP)进行的案例研究完成的。然后将有关方法的结果与国际背景进行对比,以便为面临事前影响评估的评估人员和计划管理机构提供扎实的见解。研究设计:对2007年至2013年期间的所有欧洲RDP(共88个)及其相应的事前评估(共70个)进行了分析,重点是社会经济影响评估。结果:尽管欧洲委员会(EC)要求将其作为一项强制性任务,但只有46.6%的区域提供了对社会经济影响的量化影响估计。欧盟通常推荐使用推荐的方法,但是由于使用定性方法代替定量方法,因此缺乏混合方法。争论的两个主要困难是计划影响的复杂性和所需计划信息的缺乏。结论:已经发现,定性方法本身不适合事前影响评估,而定量方法(例如微观模拟模型)可以很好地逼近实际影响。但是,由于时间和预算的限制,定量方法和混合方法应主要应用于对计划成功最相关的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号