首页> 外文期刊>European Spine Journal >Comparison of inpatient treatment costs after balloon kyphoplasty and non-surgical treatment of vertebral body compression fractures
【24h】

Comparison of inpatient treatment costs after balloon kyphoplasty and non-surgical treatment of vertebral body compression fractures

机译:球囊后凸成形术和非手术治疗椎体压缩性骨折后住院治疗费用的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We performed an analysis of following costs after primary conservative or operative treatment with balloon kyphoplasty (BKP) in osteoporotic vertebral fractures. Patients with primary osteoporotic vertebral fractures treated with BKP or conservatively from discharge year 2002–2005 were retrospectively assessed regarding the following hospital treatment in any hospital in Austria from 2002 to 2006. A statistical record linkage between the hospital data and the mortality registry of Statistic Austria was performed. The data search was restricted to ICD-10 and procedures according to the Austrian catalogue of procedures defined as “spine relevant”. Number of readmissions, length of hospital stay and DRG related costs were calculated for the surgical and conservative group separately. 324.5 years (mean 2.93 ± 1.40, conservative group) and 343.6 (mean 2.56 ± 0.96, BKP group) of 110 conservative patients and 134 BKP patients were analyzed. There was no statistical difference of the mortality rate with 9 patients (6.7%, BKP) and 11 patients (9.9%, conservative). The number of readmissions was 1.62 times higher (P = 0.039), the length of stay 1.09 times higher (P = 0.046) in the conservative group. No difference in the DRG scores were found (P = 0.11). In conclusion, patients with osteoporotic vertebral fractures showed in the following years after BKP fewer hospital readmissions and shorter hospital stays but no difference in DRG scores in comparison to conservatively treated patients.
机译:在对骨质疏松性椎体骨折进行球囊后凸成形术(BKP)的初步保守或手术治疗后,我们对以下费用进行了分析。回顾性评估2002年至2006年在奥地利任何一家医院接受BKP治疗或保守出院2002年至2005年出院的原发性骨质疏松椎体骨折患者的以下医院治疗情况。医院数据与Statistic Austria死亡率登记册之间的统计记录关联被执行了。数据搜索仅限于ICD-10和根据奥地利定义为“脊柱相关”程序目录的程序。分别计算了手术组和保守组的再入院次数,住院时间和DRG相关费用。分析了110名保守患者和134名BKP患者的324.5岁(平均2.93±1.40,保守组)和343.6岁(平均2.56±0.96,BKP组)。 9例(6.7%,BKP)和11例(9.9%,保守)的死亡率无统计学差异。保守组的再入院次数高1.62倍(P = 0.039),住院时间长1.09倍(P = 0.046)。在DRG评分中未发现差异(P = 0.11)。总之,与保守治疗的患者相比,BKP后的几年中,骨质疏松性椎体骨折的患者再次住院和住院时间短,但DRG评分无差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号