首页> 外文期刊>European review of economic history >Why did the first farmers toil? Human metabolism and the origins of agriculture
【24h】

Why did the first farmers toil? Human metabolism and the origins of agriculture

机译:为什么第一批农民辛勤工作?人类的新陈代谢与农业的起源

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Time-budget studies done among contemporary primitive people suggest that the first farmers worked harder to attain subsistence than their foraging predecessors. This makes the adoption of agriculture in the Stone Age one of the major curiosities in human cultural history. Theories offered by economists and economic historians largely fail to capture work-intensification among early farmers. Attributing a key role to human metabolism, this study provides a simple framework for analysing the adoption of agriculture. It demonstrates how the additional output that farming offered could have lured people into agriculture, but that subsequent population increase would eventually have swallowed up its benefits, forcing early farmers into an irreversible trap, where they had to do more work to attain subsistence compared to their foraging ancestors. The framework draws attention to the fact that, if agriculture arose out of need, as some scholars have suggested, then this was because prehistoric foragers turned down agriculture in the first place. Estimates of population growth before and after farming, however, in the light of the present framework seem to suggest that hunters were pulled rather than pushed into agriculture.
机译:在当代原始人中进行的时间预算研究表明,第一批农民比他们的觅食前辈更加努力地维持生计。这使石器时代采用农业成为人类文化历史上的主要好奇之一。经济学家和经济史学家提出的理论在很大程度上未能抓住早期农民中的劳动密集型问题。归因于人类代谢的关键作用,这项研究提供了一个简单的框架,用于分析农业的采用。它表明了农业提供的额外产出如何吸引人们进入农业,但是随后的人口增长最终将吞噬农业带来的利益,迫使早期农民陷入不可逆转的陷阱,与他们相比,他们不得不做更多的工作来维持生计觅食的祖先。该框架提请注意以下事实:如果像某些学者所建议的那样,由于农业而导致了需求的增长,那是因为史前的觅食者首先拒绝了农业。然而,根据目前的框架,对农业前后人口增长的估计似乎表明,猎人被拉动而不是被推向农业。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号