...
首页> 外文期刊>European Neurology >Clinical Identification of Dysarthria Types among Neurologists, Residents in Neurology and Speech Therapists
【24h】

Clinical Identification of Dysarthria Types among Neurologists, Residents in Neurology and Speech Therapists

机译:神经科医生,住院医师和言语治疗师中的构音障碍类型的临床鉴定

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Classification of dysarthria types comprises flaccid, spastic, ataxic, hypo- and hyperkinetic and mixed dysarthria. This study focussed on the ability of neurologists to clinically identify the correct type of dysarthria in neurological patients. Methods: Eighteen patients with dysarthria and 4 healthy controls were enrolled in the study. The gold standard for dysarthria type was the underlying neurological disease. Recordings of a standard reading passage and free speech were made. Raters were neurologists, residents in neurology and speech therapists, whose scores were compared. Results: Neurologists correctly identified 40% of the recordings, residents 41%, and speech therapists 37%. Interrater agreement was fair among all 3 groups; intrarater agreement was fair to moderate. Conclusion: This study suggests that neurologists should be aware of the unreliability of identifying the dysarthria type without the use of additional validated instruments or rating scales in a clinical setting.
机译:背景:构音障碍类型的分类包括松弛,痉挛,共济失调,运动减退和运动亢进以及混合性构音障碍。这项研究的重点是神经科医生在临床上确定神经系统疾病患者的构音障碍的正确类型的能力。方法:本研究共纳入18例构音障碍患者和4名健康对照者。构音障碍类型的金标准是潜在的神经系统疾病。记录了标准阅读段落和言论自由。评分者是神经科医生,神经病学和言语治疗师,他们的得分进行了比较。结果:神经科医生正确识别了40%的录音,居民识别了41%,言语治疗师则识别了37%。所有三个组之间的评估者之间的协议均公平;评分者之间的协议普遍程度适中。结论:这项研究表明,神经科医师应意识到,在临床环境中不使用其他经过验证的仪器或评定量表,就很难确定构音障碍类型。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号