首页> 外文期刊>European management journal >Effects of coercive regulation versus voluntary and cooperative auto-regulation on environmental adaptation and performance: Empirical evidence in Spain
【24h】

Effects of coercive regulation versus voluntary and cooperative auto-regulation on environmental adaptation and performance: Empirical evidence in Spain

机译:强制性监管与自愿性和合作性自动监管对环境适应和绩效的影响:西班牙的经验证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The question of what types of public environmental policies contribute most effectively to environmental innovation in companies remains open. This study evaluated how managerial perception of public environmental policy inspired the way in which firms act to adapt to challenges related to the natural environment, and the subsequent advancements in environmental performance of the firms. Our empirical analysis was based on data sets of environmental behaviour and the results from 1151 Spanish firms during the period 2002-2005. Our research concluded that each model of environmental public policy inspired different patterns of environmental adaptation by the firms. Voluntary policies, and within them those based on cooperation, were the most stimulating for the adoption of proactive environmental practices, especially those more innovative practices that may even extend beyond legal regulation. The adoption of more advanced environmental innovations by firms submitted to auto-regulation allowed both a superior improvement and a higher level of environmental performance.
机译:什么样的公共环境政策最有效地促进公司的环境创新的问题仍然悬而未决。这项研究评估了管理者对公共环境政策的看法如何激发企业适应自然环境挑战的方式,以及企业随后在环境绩效方面的进步。我们的经验分析是基于环境行为的数据集以及2002-2005年间来自1151家西班牙公司的结果。我们的研究得出结论,每种环境公共政策模型都激发了企业对环境适应的不同模式。自愿性政策,其中包括基于合作的自愿性政策,对于采取积极的环境做法,尤其是那些甚至可能超出法律法规的更具创新性的做法,最为刺激。接受自动监管的公司采用了更先进的环境创新技术,这不仅带来了卓越的改进,而且还提高了环境绩效水平。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号