...
首页> 外文期刊>European management journal >Explaining ambidextrous leadership in the aerospace and defense organizations
【24h】

Explaining ambidextrous leadership in the aerospace and defense organizations

机译:解释在航空航天和国防组织中的领导才能

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Researchers have increasingly been using the term of organizational ambidexterity to denote the simultaneous use of exploration and exploitation in organizations. Exploration refers to innovation, whereas exploitation addresses cost efficiency. However, despite the plethora of research output on ambidexterity, very few studies are actually providing insights into what specific behaviors and leadership styles accomplish ambidexterity and how organizational constraints influence ambidextrous leadership. In this research, we aim to explain the key properties of ambidextrous leadership, where we propose that ambidexterity is most efficiently promoted by ambidextrous leaders who combine two leadership styles: transformational leadership and transactional leadership. In our study, we associate transformational leadership to exploration, whereas transactional leadership is linked to exploitation. We conduct a research on ambidextrous leadership in the aerospace and defense organizations while also taking into account how organizational structure and environmental dynamism impact leadership styles. The results of our research reveal that both leadership styles are present at the senior management level. Top management, however, mostly uses transactional leadership in part because of structural and environmental constraints while also employing some limited form of transformational leadership style. Therefore, our study concludes that in this particular field the ambidextrous leaders are primarily focused on exploitative activities, while only a limited amount of their time is being allocated on exploration-oriented objectives. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:研究人员越来越多地使用组织歧义性来表示组织中同时使用探索和利用。探索是指创新,而开发则是解决成本效率问题。然而,尽管关于歧义性的研究成果过多,但实际上很少有研究提供关于哪些特定行为和领导方式实现歧义性以及组织约束如何影响歧义性领导力的见解。在本研究中,我们旨在解释灵巧的领导力的关键特性,在此我们建议,灵巧的领导者可以最有效地促进灵巧性,这种灵巧的领导者将两种领导方式结合在一起:变革型领导和交易型领导。在我们的研究中,我们将变革型领导与探索联系在一起,而交易型领导与剥削联系在一起。我们对航空航天和国防组织的敏捷领导力进行了研究,同时还考虑了组织结构和环境活力如何影响领导风格。我们的研究结果表明,两种领导风格都存在于高级管理层。但是,高层管理人员大多使用事务性领导,部分原因是结构和环境方面的限制,同时也采用了某些有限形式的变革型领导风格。因此,我们的研究得出的结论是,在这个特定领域中,灵巧的领导者主要专注于剥削活动,而只有有限的时间分配给了以勘探为导向的目标。 (C)2019 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号