首页> 外文期刊>European journal of political economy >Are OECD policy recommendations for public sector reform biased against welfare states? Evidence from a new database
【24h】

Are OECD policy recommendations for public sector reform biased against welfare states? Evidence from a new database

机译:经合组织对公共部门改革的政策建议是否偏向福利国家?来自新数据库的证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Policy advice by the OECD has long been at the heart of academic debates on welfare state reform, with frequent claims questioning the ideological orientation of recommendations. This paper constructs an indicator of perceived reform need for 24 countries, quantifying the policy advice contained in the OECD Economic Surveys around 1985, 1995, and 2005. These recommendations describe a policy consensus that is based on competition, work incentives, monetary reform, fiscal discipline, and labor market reform. Empirically, perceived need for reform is well explained by preceding levels of economic freedom. In particular, countries with more government intervention, lower property rights protection, and more regulation are perceived to have a bigger reform need. In turn, perceived reform need has no explanatory power for subsequent changes in social expenditure and welfare state entitlements. Only in countries with right wing governments, perceived reform need might be followed by marginal reductions in welfare state entitlements, but definitely not in social expenditure.
机译:经合组织的政策咨询长期以来一直是福利国家改革的学术辩论的核心,经常有人对建议的思想取向提出质疑。本文构建了一个针对24个国家的改革需求的指标,量化了1985、1995和2005年左右经合组织经济调查所包含的政策建议。这些建议描述了基于竞争,工作激励,货币改革,财政政策的政策共识。纪律和劳动力市场改革。从经验上讲,先前的经济自由水平很好地解释了人们认为的改革需求。特别是,人们认为,政府干预更多,产权保护程度较低和法规更多的国家对改革的需求更大。反过来,认为的改革需求没有解释力,无法随后改变社会支出和福利国家权益。仅在拥有右翼政府的国家中,可能会在感觉到改革需要之后才稍微减少福利国家的应享权利,但绝对不会减少社会支出。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号