...
首页> 外文期刊>European journal of marketing >Commentary: do brands compete or coexist? By Sheth and Koschmann. From brand to subcategory competition
【24h】

Commentary: do brands compete or coexist? By Sheth and Koschmann. From brand to subcategory competition

机译:评论:品牌竞争还是共存? Sheth和Koschmann着。从品牌到子类别竞争

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Purpose A response to Sheth and Koschmann's Do brands compete or coexist? How persistence of brand loyalty segments the market. Design/methodology/approach This paper is a comment piece written in response to Sheth and Koschmann's "Do brands compete or coexist? How persistence of brand loyalty segments the market". Findings In their article, Sheth and Koschmann's position on brand competition reinforces the view that vigorous and costly competitive initiative designed to lure customers from one brand to another are futile in nature. Brand loyalty is too high. This note outlines that the only way to grow a business is to create "must haves" that define subcategories, manage these subcategories to success and build structural barriers to inhibit competition from gaining relevance. A firm's focus on maintaining existing customers is a sound investment, but attempting to seek growth through attracting customers of competitors will not create growth. Originality/value This response to Sheth and Koschmann's paper provides a scholarly dialogue centered upon the premise of brand loyalty within the context of market competition.
机译:目的对Sheth和Koschmann的品牌的反应是竞争还是共存?品牌忠诚度的持久性如何细分市场。设计/方法论/方法本文是针对Sheth和Koschmann的“品牌竞争还是共存?品牌忠诚度如何持久地细分市场”而写的评论文章。调查结果Sheth和Koschmann在品牌竞争中的立场强化了这样一种观点,即旨在将客户从一个品牌吸引到另一个品牌的强有力且成本高昂的竞争举措本质上是徒劳的。品牌忠诚度太高。本说明概述了发展业务的唯一方法是创建定义子类别的“必备品”,管理这些子类别以取得成功,并建立结构性壁垒以阻止竞争获得相关性。公司专注于维持现有客户是一项不错的投资,但是试图通过吸引竞争对手的客户来寻求增长并不会创造增长。原创性/价值对Sheth和Koschmann论文的回应提供了一种学术对话,以市场竞争背景下的品牌忠诚为前提。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号