...
首页> 外文期刊>European journal of law and economics >Those crazy transaction costs: on the irrelevance of the equivalence between monetary damages and specific performance
【24h】

Those crazy transaction costs: on the irrelevance of the equivalence between monetary damages and specific performance

机译:那些疯狂的交易成本:与金钱损失和特定业绩之间的等价关系无关

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The Coase theorem tells us that monetary damages and specific performance remedies for breach of contract have identical effects when transaction costs are zero. This has become a standard part of the literature on the economics of contract law. This note argues that the traditional view is somewhat misguided, as monetary damages and specific performance remedies are unnecessary in a zero transaction costs world. We go on to show how the presence of transaction costs impact the decisions of contracting parties as between the inclusion of liquidated damages clauses in contracts and resorting to litigation that could result in the application of either monetary damages or specific performance remedies.
机译:科斯定理告诉我们,当交易成本为零时,金钱损失和针对违约的特定性能补救措施具有相同的效果。这已经成为合同法经济学文献的标准部分。本说明认为,传统观点有些误导,因为在零交易成本的世界中,不需要金钱损失和特定的性能补救措施。我们继续说明交易成本的存在是如何影响合同方的决定的,包括在合同中包含违约赔偿金条款和诉诸可能导致应用金钱损失或特定性能补救措施的诉讼之间。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号