...
首页> 外文期刊>The European journal of finance >State-ownership and bank loan contracting: evidence from corporate fraud
【24h】

State-ownership and bank loan contracting: evidence from corporate fraud

机译:国家所有权和银行贷款合同:公司欺诈的证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This paper explores the effect of borrower and lender state-ownership on the consequences of corporate fraud in the debt market. Fraud revelations can increase a firm's information and credit risk, and are therefore expected to significantly affect future bank loan conditions. The Chinese economy provides a unique setting from which to study the influence of state-ownership on debt contracting because it is dominated by state-owned banks (SBs) and firms. Using a sample of bank loans and enforcement actions announced between 2001 and 2012, we find that, after fraud announcements, the cost of private debt increases significantly, but not for loans issued by SBs to state-owned enterprises (SOEs). Moreover, we find evidence that SBs grant, and SOEs receive, lower interest rates. Additional tests show that SOEs that received a more favorable interest rate after the announcement of fraud from a SB perform worse than other firms. These results indicate that despite the bank reforms SBs continue to favor SOEs and this could lead to sub-optimal lending.
机译:本文探讨了借贷者和贷方国家所有权对债务市场中公司欺诈的后果的影响。欺诈信息的披露会增加公司的信息和信用风险,因此预计会严重影响未来的银行贷款条件。中国经济提供了一个独特的环境,从中可以研究国家所有权对债务承包的影响,因为它由国有银行(SBs)和企业主导。使用2001年至2012年间宣布的银行贷款和执法行动的样本,我们发现,在欺诈行为宣布之后,私人债务的成本显着增加,但SB发行给国有企业(SOE)的贷款却没有。此外,我们发现有证据表明,SB授予和SOE可以获得较低的利率。其他测试表明,在SB宣布欺诈之后,获得了更优惠利率的国有企业的表现要比其他公司差。这些结果表明,尽管进行了银行改革,但SB仍继续偏爱国有企业,这可能导致次优贷款。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号