首页> 外文期刊>European Journal of Communication >Selling scandal or ideology? The politics of business crime coverage
【24h】

Selling scandal or ideology? The politics of business crime coverage

机译:卖丑闻还是意识形态?商业犯罪报道的政治

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Financial scandals and controversies have recently attracted much attention in the British press. The excesses of the bankers' bonuses, MPs' expenses scandals and those deemed 'benefit cheats' and welfare scroungers have been given prominence by the print news media, and the present Coalition government. The politicization of the current financial crisis has resulted in 'the privatization of loss and the socialization of costs'. Yet how do we make sense of this? Or how are those responsible for financial wrongdoings able to 'get away with it'? This article suggests that the interests of business as a class remain largely uncontested in contemporary political discourse. Just one way in which this is evident is through the coverage of financial crime, and this article offers as illustration a case study of the political construction of business crime (price fixing) in the pages of the British press. It is suggested that the way in which this crime is framed is reflective of a broader ideological discursive commitment which privileges business interests over the public interest.
机译:最近,金融丑闻和争议引起了英国媒体的广泛关注。印刷新闻媒体和现任联合政府都突出了银行家的奖金,国会议员的支出丑闻以及被认为是“福利骗子”和福利部门的超额款项。当前金融危机的政治化导致“损失的私有化和成本的社会化”。然而,我们如何理解这一点呢?或那些对财务违法行为负责的人如何“摆脱困境”?本文表明,作为一个阶级的商业利益在当代政治话语中仍然没有争议。显而易见的一种方式是通过金融犯罪的报道,本文以英国媒体的专页为例,对商业犯罪的政治结构(价格固定)进行了案例研究。有证据表明,这种犯罪的构成方式反映了更广泛的意识形态话语承诺,使商业利益享有高于公共利益的特权。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号