首页> 外文期刊>European intellectual property review >Financial Reporting of Intellectual Property Holdings for Australian Listed Companies
【24h】

Financial Reporting of Intellectual Property Holdings for Australian Listed Companies

机译:澳大利亚上市公司知识产权控股的财务报告

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The history of Australian accounting standards and financial reporting of intellectual property demonstrates some of the difficulties encountered by standard setters when dealing with innovative assets of high value and importance. Innovative financial assets in the form of various types of intellectual property have provided fertile ground for somewhat controversial measures for valuation and financial reporting. Intangible assets in the past have been categorised as either "identifiable", such as patents, trade marks, copyright, mastheads and registered designs, or "unidentifiable", the most common being goodwill. With the adoption of the new accounting standards, the specific categories of intellectual property may well now be replaced with the more generic label of "intangible asset".rnThe new accounting standards further reinforce the use of amortised cost as frontrunner of valuation methodologies for intangible assets, including all types of intellectual property. The absence of a verifiable active market for many types of intangibles negates the use of alternative valuation models on the grounds of market transparency. Moreover, the new standards reduce the breadth of reportable intellectual property assets to investors. Instead of recognising incurred expenditure on an intangible as an asset in the entity's balance sheet, the reported outcome would ordinarily be recognised as an expense in the entity's profit and loss statement. The likely effect for reporting entities and listed companies would be for lower reported profit and lower reported assets. Consequently, investors may not respond kindly to entities that have incurred high expenditure on intangibles. Temptation may lead to some entities mislabelling or, worse, not reporting expenditures on intangibles in their financial reports. This, in turn, may reduce the quality of information being relayed to investors who rely on accurate and detailed descriptions contained in the company's financial reports.
机译:澳大利亚会计准则和知识产权财务报告的历史证明了标准制定者在处理具有高价值和重要性的创新资产时遇到的一些困难。各种知识产权形式的创新性金融资产为估值和财务报告颇具争议的措施提供了沃土。过去,无形资产被分类为“可识别的”,例如专利,商标,版权,标头和注册外观设计,或“无法识别的”,最常见的是商誉。随着新会计准则的采用,现在可以用更通用的“无形资产”标签代替特定类别的知识产权。rn新会计准则进一步加强了摊销成本作为无形资产评估方法的先驱,包括所有类型的知识产权。对于许多类型的无形资产缺乏可核查的活跃市场,以市场透明为由否定了使用其他估值模型的可能性。此外,新准则降低了向投资者报告的知识产权资产的广度。与其在实体的资产负债表中将无形资产的已发生支出确认为资产,不如将报告的结果通常在实体的损益表中确认为费用。对于报告实体和上市公司而言,可能产生的影响是报告的利润减少和报告的资产减少。因此,投资者可能不会对无形资产的高额支出做出善意的回应。诱惑可能导致某些实体贴错标签,或者更糟的是,没有在财务报告中报告无形资产的支出。反过来,这可能会降低传递给依赖公司财务报告中准确和详细描述的投资者的信息的质量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号