首页> 外文期刊>European intellectual property review >Flashing Badge Co Ltd v Groves: A Step Forward in the Clarification of the Copyright/Design Interface
【24h】

Flashing Badge Co Ltd v Groves: A Step Forward in the Clarification of the Copyright/Design Interface

机译:Flashing Badge Co Ltd诉Groves:在澄清版权/设计界面方面迈出了一步

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Although s.51 of the Copyright, Design and Patents Act 1988 (CDPA) was meant to clarify the respective scope of copyright and unregistered design right (UDR), as Professor Cornish said early on, "a degree of uncertainty infects the penumbra of section 51, as can be seen if each of its requirements are further examined". Does this statement still hold true after Flashing Badge Co Ltd v Groves,the most recent case reinterpreting s.51 after the confusing decision of the Court of Appeal in Lambretta Clothing Co Ltd v Teddy Smith (UK) Ltd?
机译:尽管1988年《版权,设计和专利法》(CDPA)第51条旨在阐明版权和未注册设计权(UDR)的各自范围,但正如Cornish教授早些时候所说,“一定程度的不确定性影响了本节的半影。 51,可以看出是否进一步检查了其每个要求。”在Flashing Badge Co Ltd诉Groves案(上诉法院在Lambretta Clothing Co Ltd诉Teddy Smith(UK)Ltd案)中作出令人困惑的裁决后,最近的一案重新解释了第51条,这一说法是否仍然成立?

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号