首页> 外文期刊>European intellectual property review >The Territorial Effect of Sanctions Under the Community Trade Marks Regulation: The ECJ Delivers its Judgment in DHL v Chronopost
【24h】

The Territorial Effect of Sanctions Under the Community Trade Marks Regulation: The ECJ Delivers its Judgment in DHL v Chronopost

机译:共同体商标法规下制裁的地域效力:欧洲法院在DHL诉Chronopost案中作出判决

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Responding to a reference from the French Cour de Cassation, the ECJ has clarified the territorial scope of injunctions and the coercive measures used to enforce such injunctions for infringement of a Community trade mark (CTM). It held that the scope of the prohibition against further infringement or threatened infringement of a CTM extends, as a rule, to the entire area of the European Union. It also held that "coercive measures" ordered by a Community trade mark court to ensure compliance with an injunction will extend to all Member States in which the injunction is effective. The courts of those other Member States must ensure that the prohibition is complied with in an equivalent manner, where there is no power to impose coercive measures of the same type. Additionally, the court recognised that there may be limited circumstances in which the prohibition ought not to extend across the whole of the European Union.
机译:欧洲法院对法国最高上诉法院的提法作出回应,澄清了禁令的领土范围以及为侵犯共同体商标(CTM)而强制执行此类禁令的强制措施。它认为,禁止进一步侵犯或威胁要威胁商标转让的范围通常扩大到整个欧盟地区。它还认为,共同体商标法院为确保遵守禁令而下达的“强制性措施”将适用于所有实施禁令的成员国。其他成员国的法院必须确保在没有权力施加相同类型的强制性措施的情况下,以同等的方式遵守该禁令。此外,法院认识到,在某些情况下,禁令不应扩展到整个欧洲联盟。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号