首页> 外文期刊>Ethics & the environment >WHITHER ENVIRONMENTAL PHILOSOPHY?
【24h】

WHITHER ENVIRONMENTAL PHILOSOPHY?

机译:是否使用环境哲学?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

By most reasonable standards, environmental philosophy has been an enormous success since its beginnings in the 1970s. Courses in the subject are now taught around the world, there are many opportunities for publishing, there are two dedicated graduate programs, and there are even some jobs in the field.rnYet these marks of success mask some problems. Environmental philosophy is fragmented along many dimensions and there are no widely shared standards of competence. The available jobs often go to surprising candidates whose skills and interests are extremely diverse. Too much publication appears in "specialist" journals, unnoticed by anyone but other contributors. Unconstructive debates, often reminiscent in tone, substance, and rancor of the old and new left, linger. In light of all this, I am no longer surprised when I meet people active in environmental studies and causes who claim to be environmental ethicists but who are almost entirely ignorant of the academic field that bears the name.
机译:从最合理的标准来看,环境哲学自1970年代开始就获得了巨大的成功。现在在世界各地教授该主题的课程,有很多出版的机会,有两个专门的研究生课程,甚至在该领域有一些工作。然而,这些成功的标志掩盖了一些问题。环境哲学在许多方面是零散的,没有广泛共享的能力标准。可用的工作通常会去给令人惊讶的候选人,他们的技能和兴趣非常不同。在“专业”期刊上发表过多的出版物,只有其他撰稿人才注意到。毫无争议的辩论,常常让人回想起新旧左派的语气,实质和怨恨。有鉴于此,当我遇到活跃于环境研究领域并引起自称是环境伦理学家但几乎完全不了解该名称的学术领域的人们时,我不再感到惊讶。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号