...
首页> 外文期刊>Ethical Theory and Moral Practice >Is Divorce Promise-Breaking?
【24h】

Is Divorce Promise-Breaking?

机译:是离婚承诺吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Wedding vows seem to be promises. So they go: “I promise to love, honour, and cherish ....” But this poses a problem. Divorce is not widely seen as a serious moral wrong, but breaking a promise is. I first consider, and defend against preliminary objections, a ‘hard-line’ response: divorce is indeed prima facie impermissible promise-breaking. I next consider the ‘hardship’ response—the hardship of failed marriages overrides the prima facie duty to keep promises. However, this would release promisors in far too many cases. I resolve the triad by considering the content of the vows. Vows concerning love are not promises at all. We cannot promise to do acts the performance of which is outside our control, and love involves states of mind outside our control. Vows concerning spousal roles are complicated by diverse social understandings of marriage and the centrality of emotion to the roles.
机译:结婚誓言似乎是一个承诺。于是他们走了:“我保证去爱,荣誉和珍惜……。”但这带来了一个问题。离婚不是普遍被认为是严重的道德错误,但违背诺言却是。首先,我考虑并反对初步的反对意见:“强硬”回应:离婚确实是表面上不允许的违约。接下来,我将考虑“困难”的应对措施–失败婚姻的困难会取代表面上履行诺言的义务。但是,这将在太多情况下释放承诺者。我通过考虑誓言的内容来解决三合会。关于爱情的誓言根本不是诺言。我们不能保证做出无法控制的行为,而爱牵涉到无法控制的心理状态。社会对婚姻的各种理解以及情感对角色的中心作用,使得关于配偶角色的誓言变得复杂。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号