首页> 外文期刊>Ergonomics >EDITORIAL Ergonomic vs. Ergonomics: acknowledging the etymology
【24h】

EDITORIAL Ergonomic vs. Ergonomics: acknowledging the etymology

机译:人体工程学与人体工程学:承认词源

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

When certain influential ergonomics practitioners and researchers received their initial training, they were clearly and firmly instructed that correct usage is 'ergonomics' as a noun. With regard to 'ergonomic', some tutors could be unsympathetic if a student used this as the adjective form, advising it to be both wrong and inappropriate. At least in part, this position was probably a reaction to growing misuse of 'ergonomic' to describe and promote products and services revealing little evidence of any meaningful engagement with ergonomics.
机译:当某些有影响力的人机工程学从业人员和研究人员接受了初步培训时,他们明确而明确地指示正确的用法是“人机工程学”的名词。关于“人机工程学”,如果学生将其用作形容词形式,则某些导师可能会表示同情,认为这种做法既错误又不合适。至少在某种程度上,这一立场可能是对滥用“人体工学”来描述和推广产品和服务的日益反应的结果,几乎没有证据表明有人参与了人体工程学。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号