首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Technology >ESTIMATING POLLUTANT REMOVAL REQUIREMENTS FOR LANDFILLS IN THE UK: II. MODEL DEVELOPMENT
【24h】

ESTIMATING POLLUTANT REMOVAL REQUIREMENTS FOR LANDFILLS IN THE UK: II. MODEL DEVELOPMENT

机译:估算英国垃圾填埋的污染物去除要求:II。模型开发

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

A modelling methodology using a leachate source term has been produced for estimating the timescales for achieving environmental equilibrium status for landfilled waste. Results are reported as the period of active management required for modelled scenarios of non-flushed and flushed sites for a range of pre-filling treatments. The base scenario against which results were evaluated was raw municipal solid waste (MSW) for which only cadmium failed to reach equilibrium. Flushed raw MSW met our criteria for stabilisation with active leachate management for 40 years, subject to each of the leachate species being present at or below their average UK concentrations. Stable non-reactive wastes, meeting EU waste acceptance criteria, fared badly in the non-flushed scenario, with only two species stabilising after a management period within 1000 years and the majority requiring > 2000 years of active leachate management. The flushing scenarios showed only a marginal improvement, with arsenic still persisting beyond 2000 years management even with an additional 500 mm y~(-1) of infiltration. The stabilisation time for mechanically sorted organic residues (without flushing) was high, and even with flushing, arsenic and chromium appeared to remain a problem. Two mechanical biological treatment (MBT) scenarios were examined, with medium and high intensity composting. Both were subjected to the non-flushing and flushing scenarios. The non-flushing case of both options fell short of the basic requirements of achieving equilibrium within decades. The intense composting option with minimal flushing appeared to create a scenario where equilibrium could be achieved. For incinerator bottom ash (raw and subjected to various treatments), antimony, copper, chloride and sulphate were the main controls on achieving equilibrium, irrespective of treatment type. Flushing at higher flushing rates (500 mm y~(-1)) failed to demonstrate a significant reduction in the management period required.
机译:已经产生了使用渗滤液源项的建模方法,以估计实现垃圾填埋场环境平衡状态的时间表。结果报告为一系列预先填充处理的非冲洗和冲洗场地模拟场景所需的主动管理时间。评估结果的基本方案是仅镉未能达到平衡的城市生活垃圾(MSW)。冲洗过的原始城市固体废弃物通过渗滤液的有效管理已达到我们稳定40年的标准,条件是每种渗滤液的存在浓度均低于或低于其英国平均浓度。符合欧盟废物接受标准的稳定的非反应性废物在非污染情况下表现不佳,在经过1000年的管理期后,只有两个物种稳定下来,大多数需要> 2000年的活跃渗滤液管理。冲洗情况仅显示出少量改善,即使渗入量增加了500 mm y〜(-1),砷仍持续了2000年以上的管理。机械分选的有机残留物的稳定时间很高(不冲洗),即使冲洗,砷和铬似乎仍然是一个问题。研究了两种机械生物处理(MBT)方案,即中强度堆肥和高强度堆肥。两者都经受了非冲洗和冲洗方案。两种选择的非冲洗情况都没有达到几十年内达到平衡的基本要求。用最少的冲洗量进行激烈的堆肥处理似乎创造了可以实现平衡的方案。对于焚烧炉底灰(未加工并经过各种处理),无论处理类型如何,锑,铜,氯化物和硫酸盐都是达到平衡的主要控制手段。以较高的冲洗速度(500 mm y〜(-1))冲洗无法证明所需的管理时间显着减少。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号