首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Science & Technology >In Vitro Assessment of Modes of Toxic Action of Pharmaceuticals in Aquatic Life
【24h】

In Vitro Assessment of Modes of Toxic Action of Pharmaceuticals in Aquatic Life

机译:水生生物中药物毒性作用方式的体外评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

An ecotoxicological test battery based on a mode-of-action approach was designed and applied to the hazard identification and classification of modes of action of six Pharmaceuticals (carbamazepine,diclofenac,ethinyl estradiol,ibuprofen,propranolol,and sulfamethoxazole).The rationale behind the design of the battery was to cover the relevant interactions that a compound may have with biological targets.It is thus not comprehensive but contains representative examples of each category of mode of toxic action including nonspecific,specific,and reactive toxicity.The test battery consists of one test system for nonspecific toxicity (baseline toxicity or narcosis),two test systems for specific effects,and two test systems for reactive toxicity.The baseline toxicity was quantified with the Kinspec test,which detects membrane leakage via measurements of membrane potential.This test system may also be used to detect the specific effects on energy transduction,although this was not relevant to any compound investigated in this study.As examples of specific receptor-mediated toxicity,we chose the yeast estrogen screen (YES) as a specific test for estrogenicity,and the inhibition of chlorophyll fluorescence in algae to assess specific effects on photosynthesis.Reactive modes of action were assessed indirectly by measuring the relevance of cellular defense systems.Differences in growth inhibition curves between a mutant of Escherichia coli that could not synthesize glutathione and its parent strain indicate the relevance of conjugation with glutathione as a defense mechanism,which is an indirect indicator of protein damage.DNA damage was assessed by comparing the growth inhibition in a strain that lacks various DNA repair systems with that in its competent parent strain.Most compounds acted merely as baseline toxicants in all test systems.As expected,ethinylestradiol was the only compound snowing estrogenic activity.Propranolol was baseline-toxic in all test systems except for the photosynthesis inhibition assay,where it surprisingly showed a 100-fold excess toxicity over the predicted baseline effect.The exact mode of toxic action could not be confirmed,but additional chlorophyll fluorescence induction experiments excluded the possibility of direct interference with photosynthesis through photosystem II inhibition.Mixture experiments were performed as a diagnostic tool to analyze the mode of toxic action.Compounds with the same mode of toxic action showed the expected concentration addition.In the photosynthesis inhibition assay,agreement between experimental results and prediction was best for two-stage predictions considering the assigned modes of action.In a two-stage prediction,concentration addition was used as a model to predict the mixture effect of the baseline toxicants followed by their independent action as a single component combined with the specifically acting compound propranolol and the reference compound diuron.A comparison with acute toxicity data for algae,daphnia,and fish showed generally good agreement for the nonspecifically acting compounds but also that the proposed test battery offered better diagnostic value in the case of the specifically acting compounds.
机译:设计了一种基于作用方式的生态毒理学测试电池,并将其应用于六种药物(卡马西平,双氯芬酸,乙炔雌二醇,布洛芬,普萘洛尔和磺胺甲恶唑)的危害识别和作用方式分类。电池的设计是为了涵盖化合物可能与生物靶标之间的相关相互作用。因此,它不是全面的,但包含了各种毒性作用方式的代表实例,包括非特异性,特异性和反应性毒性。一种用于非特异性毒性(基线毒性或麻醉性)的测试系统,两种用于特定作用的测试系统,以及两种用于反应性毒性的测试系统。使用Kinspec测试对基线毒性进行定量,该测试通过测量膜电位来检测膜泄漏。该系统也可用于检测对能量转换的特定影响,尽管这与作为特异性受体介导的毒性的例子,我们选择了酵母雌激素筛查(YES)作为雌激素的特异性测试,以及藻类中叶绿素荧光的抑制作用,以评估对光合作用的特定作用。不能通过测量细胞防御系统的相关性来间接评估其作用。不能合成谷胱甘肽的大肠杆菌突变体与其亲本菌株在生长抑制曲线上的差异表明与谷胱甘肽作为防御机制结合的相关性,这是间接指标。通过比较缺乏各种DNA修复系统的菌株与其感受态亲本菌株中的生长抑制作用来评估DNA损伤。大多数化合物在所有测试系统中仅起基线毒性作用。正如预期的那样,炔雌醇是唯一的化合物降雪雌激素活性。除所有试验系统外,普萘洛尔在所有测试系统中均具有基线毒性光合作用抑制试验,令人惊讶地显示出比预期的基线效应高100倍的毒性。无法确定确切的毒性作用方式,但其他叶绿素荧光诱导实验排除了通过光系统II抑制直接干扰光合作用的可能性进行混合实验作为分析毒理作用方式的诊断工具。具有相同毒理作用方式的化合物显示预期的浓度增加。在光合作用抑制试验中,实验结果与预测之间的一致性最好用于两阶段预测在两个阶段的预测中,浓度增加被用作模型来预测基线有毒物质的混合效应,然后将其作为单一组分与特定作用的化合物普萘洛尔和参考化合物组合使用,起独立作用敌草隆与急性毒性的比较藻类,水蚤和鱼类的数据表明,对于非特异性作用的化合物总体上具有很好的一致性,但是对于特定作用的化合物,建议的测试电池具有更好的诊断价值。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Environmental Science & Technology》 |2005年第9期|p.3090-3100|共11页
  • 作者单位

    Swiss Federal Institute for Environmental Science and Technology (EAWAG),CH-8600 Dubendorf,Switzerland;

    Swiss Federal Institute for Environmental Science and Technology (EAWAG),CH-8600 Dubendorf,Switzerland;

    Swiss Federal Institute for Environmental Science and Technology (EAWAG),CH-8600 Dubendorf,Switzerland;

    Swiss Federal Institute for Environmental Science and Technology (EAWAG),CH-8600 Dubendorf,Switzerland;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《生物学医学文摘》(MEDLINE);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 环境化学;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 14:07:48

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号