首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Science & Technology >Predicting Relative Protein Affinity of Novel Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFASs) by An Efficient Molecular Dynamics Approach
【24h】

Predicting Relative Protein Affinity of Novel Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFASs) by An Efficient Molecular Dynamics Approach

机译:通过高效的分子动力学方法预测新型全氟和多氟烷基物质(PFAS)的相对蛋白质亲和力

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

With the phasing out of long-chain per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs), production of a wide variety of alternative PFASs has increased to meet market demand. However, little is known about the bioaccumulation potential of these replacement compounds. Here, we developed a modeling workflow that combines molecular docking and molecular dynamics simulation techniques to estimate the relative binding affinity of a total of 15 legacy and replacement PFASs for human and rat liver-type fatty acid binding protein (hLFABP and rLFABP). The predicted results were compared with experimental data extracted from three different studies. There was good correlation between predicted free energies of binding and measured binding affinities, with correlation coefficients of 0.97, 0.79, and 0.96, respectively. With respect to replacement PFASs, our results suggest that EEA and ADONA are at least as strongly bound to rLFABP as perfluoroheptanoic acid (PFHpA), and as strongly bound to hLFABP as perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA). For F-53 and F-53B, both have similar or stronger binding affinities than perfluorooctanesulfonate (PFOS). Given that interactions of PFASs with proteins (e.g., LFABP5) are important determinants of bioaccumulation potential in organisms, these alternatives could be as bioaccumulative as legacy PFASs, and are therefore not necessarily safer alternatives to long-chain PFASs.
机译:随着逐步淘汰长链全氟烷基物质和多氟烷基物质(PFAS),增加了各种替代PFAS的产量,以满足市场需求。但是,对于这些替代化合物的生物蓄积潜力知之甚少。在这里,我们开发了一个建模流程,该流程结合了分子对接和分子动力学模拟技术,以评估总共15种传统和替代PFAS对人和大鼠肝型脂肪酸结合蛋白(hLFABP和rLFABP)的相对结合亲和力。将预测结果与从三个不同研究中提取的实验数据进行了比较。结合的预测自由能与测得的结合亲和力之间具有良好的相关性,相关系数分别为0.97、0.79和0.96。关于替代PFAS,我们的结果表明EEA和ADONA与全氟庚酸(PFHpA)至少与rLFABP牢固结合,而与全氟辛酸(PFOA)则与hLFABP牢固结合。对于F-53和F-53B,两者的亲和力都比全氟辛烷磺酸(PFOS)相似或强。鉴于PFAS与蛋白质(例如LFABP5)的相互作用是生物体内潜在生物蓄积性的重要决定因素,因此这些替代品可能具有与传统PFAS一样的生物蓄积性,因此不一定是长链PFAS的更安全替代品。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Environmental Science & Technology》 |2018年第14期|7972-7980|共9页
  • 作者

    Cheng Weixiao; Ng Carla A.;

  • 作者单位

    Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Pittsburgh, PA 15261 USA;

    Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Pittsburgh, PA 15261 USA;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《生物学医学文摘》(MEDLINE);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号