首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Science & Technology >Challenges in Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Impacts of Waste-Based Biofuels in EU and US Biofuel Policies: Case Study of Butanol and Ethanol Production from Municipal Solid Waste
【24h】

Challenges in Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Impacts of Waste-Based Biofuels in EU and US Biofuel Policies: Case Study of Butanol and Ethanol Production from Municipal Solid Waste

机译:欧盟和美国生物燃料政策中量化基于废物的生物燃料对温室气体影响的挑战:城市固体废物生产丁醇和乙醇的案例研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Conversion of wastes to biofuels is a promising route to provide renewable low-carbon fuels, based on a low- or negative-cost feedstock, whose use can avoid negative environmental impacts of conventional waste treatment. However, current policies that employ LCA as a quantitative measure are not adequate for assessing this type of fuel, given their cross-sector interactions and multiple potential product/service streams (energy, fuels, materials, waste treatment service). We employ a case study of butanol and ethanol production from mixed municipal solid waste to demonstrate the challenges in using life cycle assessment to appropriately inform decision-makers. Greenhouse gas emissions results vary from -566 gCO(2) eq/MJ(biofuel) (under US policies that employ system expansion approach) to +86 gCO(2) eq/MJ(biofuel) and +23 gCO(2) eq/MJ(biofuel) fuel (under initial and current EU policies that employ energy-based allocation), relative to gasoline emissions of +94 gCO(2) eq. LCA methods used in existing policies thus provide contradictory information to decision-makers regarding the potential for waste-based biofuels. A key factor differentiating life cycle assessment methodologies is the inclusion of avoided impacts of conventional waste treatment in US policies and their exclusion in EU policies. Present EU rules risk discouraging the valorisation of wastes to biofuels thus forcing waste toward lower-value treatment processes and products.
机译:将废物转化为生物燃料是一种基于低成本或负成本原料提供可再生低碳燃料的有前途的途径,其使用可以避免常规废物处理对环境的负面影响。但是,考虑到跨部门的相互作用以及多种潜在的产品/服务流(能源,燃料,材料,废物处理服务),当前采用LCA作为定量手段的现行政策不足以评估此类燃料。我们通过案例研究从混合的城市固体废物中生产丁醇和乙醇,以证明在使用生命周期评估为决策者提供适当信息方面的挑战。温室气体排放结果从-566 gCO(2)eq / MJ(生物燃料)(根据采用系统扩展方法的美国政策)到+86 gCO(2)eq / MJ(生物燃料)和+23 gCO(2)eq /相对于+94 gCO(2)当量的汽油排放量的MJ(生物燃料)燃料(根据采用能源分配的欧盟初始政策和现行政策)。因此,现有政策中使用的LCA方法为决策者提供了有关基于废物的生物燃料潜力的矛盾信息。区分生命周期评估方法的关键因素是美国政策中避免了传统废物处理的影响,而欧盟政策中却排除了这些影响。目前的欧盟法规有风险,不鼓励将废物定为生物燃料,从而迫使废物转向价值较低的处理工艺和产品。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Environmental Science & Technology》 |2019年第20期|12141-12149|共9页
  • 作者

    Meng Fanran; McKechnie Jon;

  • 作者单位

    Univ Nottingham Sustainable Proc Technol Grp Fac Engn Nottingham NG7 2RD England;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《生物学医学文摘》(MEDLINE);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号