首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Science & Technology >Cellulosic Ethanol from Municipal Solid Waste: A Case Study of the Economic, Energy, and Greenhouse Gas Impacts in California
【24h】

Cellulosic Ethanol from Municipal Solid Waste: A Case Study of the Economic, Energy, and Greenhouse Gas Impacts in California

机译:城市生活垃圾中的纤维素乙醇:以加利福尼亚州的经济,能源和温室气体影响为例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

As cellulosic ethanol technologies advance, states could use the organic content of municipal solid waste as a transportation fuel feedstock and simultaneously reduce externalities associated with waste disposal. We examine the major processes required to support a lignocellulosic (employing enzymatic hydrolysis) municipal solid waste-to-ethanol infrastructure computing cost, energy, and greenhouse gas effects for California. The infrastructure is compared against the Business As Usual case where the state continues to import most of its ethanol needs from the Midwest. Assuming between 60% and 90% practical yields for ethanol production, California could produce between 1.0 and 1.5 billion gallons per year of ethanol from 55% of the 40 million metric tonnes of waste currently sent to landfills annually. The classification of organic wastes and ethanol plant operation represent almost the entire system cost (between $3.5 and $4.5 billion annually) while distribution has negligible cost effects and savings from avoided landfilling is small. Fossil energy consumption from Business As Usual decreases between 82 and 130 PJ largely due to foregone gasoline consumption. The net greenhouse gas impacts are ultimately dependent on how well landfills control their emissions of decomposing organics. Based on the current landfill mix in the state, the cellulosic infrastructure would experience a slight gain in greenhouse gas emissions. However, net emissions can rise if organics diversion releases carbon that would otherwise be flared and sequestered. Emissions would be avoided if landfills are not capable of effectively controlling emissions during periods of active waste decay. There is currently considerable uncertainty surrounding the recovery efficiency of landfill emissions controls. In either case, burying lignin appears to be better than burning iignin because of its decay properties, energy and carbon content We estimate the breakeven price for lignocellulosic ethanol between $2.90 and $3.47/gal (μ = $3.13/gal).
机译:随着纤维素乙醇技术的发展,各州可以将城市固体废物的有机成分用作运输燃料的原料,同时减少与废物处理相关的外部性。我们研究了支持木质纤维素(采用酶促水解)市政固体废物转化为乙醇的基础设施所需的主要过程,计算了加利福尼亚的成本,能源和温室气体影响。将基础设施与“照常营业”案例进行了比较,在案例中,该州继续从中西部进口其大部分乙醇需求。假设乙醇生产的实际收率在60%至90%之间,加利福尼亚每年可从目前每年送往垃圾填埋场的4000万吨公吨垃圾中的55%来生产10至15亿加仑乙醇。有机废物的分类和乙醇工厂的运营几乎代表了整个系统的成本(每年3.5到45亿美元),而分销的成本影响却微不足道,避免填埋的成本也很小。常规业务的化石能源消耗在82至130 PJ之间减少,这主要是由于放弃了汽油消耗。温室气体净影响最终取决于填埋场如何控制其分解有机物的排放。根据该州目前的垃圾填埋场组合,纤维素基础设施的温室气体排放量将略有增加。但是,如果有机物转移释放出原本会燃烧和隔离的碳,则净排放量可能会增加。如果垃圾填埋场无法在废物主动腐烂期间有效控制排放,则可以避免排放。目前,围绕垃圾填埋场排放控制的回收效率存在很大的不确定性。在这两种情况下,掩埋木质素似乎都比燃烧木质素好,因为它的衰变特性,能量和碳含量。我们估计木质纤维素乙醇的盈亏平衡价格在2.90美元至3.47美元/加仑之间(μ= 3.13美元/加仑)。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Environmental Science & Technology》 |2009年第14期|5183-5189|共8页
  • 作者

    MIKHAIL CHESTER; ELLIOT MARTIN;

  • 作者单位

    Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720;

    Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《生物学医学文摘》(MEDLINE);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 14:04:36

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号