首页> 外文期刊>Environmental progress >Cooperative Decision in a Closed-Loop Supply Chain Considering Carbon Emission Reduction and Low-Carbon Promotion
【24h】

Cooperative Decision in a Closed-Loop Supply Chain Considering Carbon Emission Reduction and Low-Carbon Promotion

机译:考虑减少碳排放和促进低碳发展的闭环供应链合作决策

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study examines manufacturers' carbon emission reduction level and retailers' low-carbon promotion effort in a low-carbon closed-loop supply chain (CLSC), in which a manufacturer directly collects the used-products from consumers. Considering both the carbon emission reduction level and low-carbon promotion effort depending on the market demands, this study investigates the optimal decisions and performances of CLSC under four different game structures, that is, one non-cooperative structure and three cooperative structures. In the non-cooperative structure, the manufacturer controls the carbon emission level, the collection level as well as the wholesale price, while the retailer controls the low-carbon promotion effort and retail price. The cooperative structures consist of one-way and two-way cooperation. In one-way cooperative structure, the manufacturer shares only a part of retailer's low-carbon promotion cost. In two-way cooperative structure, the retailer shares partial manufacturer's carbon emission reduction cost or collection cost based on the one-way cooperative structure. It shows that the two-way cooperative structure of the co-op promotion and carbon emission reduction is the optimal in pricing decisions and carbon emission reduction level, as well as two-way cooperative structure of the co-op promotion and collection is the optimal in the collection effort. Under lower the consumer's low-carbon preferences, the retailer agrees to share the manufacturer's collection cost. When the consumer's low-carbon preferences are higher, the retailer agrees to share the manufacturer's carbon emission reduction cost. (c) 2018 American Institute of Chemical Engineers Environ Prog, 38: 143-153, 2019
机译:这项研究考察了制造商在低碳闭环供应链(CLSC)中的碳减排量水平和零售商在低碳促进方面的努力,其中制造商直接从消费者那里收集二手产品。考虑到根据市场需求的碳减排水平和低碳促进努力,本研究调查了四种不同的博弈结构,即一种非合作结构和三种合作结构,CLSC的最优决策和绩效。在非合作结构中,制造商控制碳排放量,收集量以及批发价,而零售商则控制低碳推广工作和零售价。合作结构包括单向和双向合作。在单向合作结构中,制造商仅承担零售商低碳促销成本的一部分。在双向合作结构中,零售商基于单向合作结构分摊了部分制造商的碳减排成本或收集成本。结果表明,合作社促进与碳减排的双向合作结构是最优的价格决定和碳减排水平,而合作社促进与碳减排的双向合作结构是最优的。在收集工作中。在较低的消费者低碳偏好下,零售商同意分担制造商的回收成本。当消费者对低碳的偏好更高时,零售商同意分摊制造商的碳减排成本。 (c)2018美国化学工程师学会Environ Prog,38:143-153,2019

著录项

  • 来源
    《Environmental progress》 |2019年第1期|143-153|共11页
  • 作者单位

    Shanghai Maritime Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Shanghai, Peoples R China|Guangxi Univ Nationalities, Sch Business, Nanning, Peoples R China;

    Shanghai Maritime Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Shanghai, Peoples R China;

    Anyang Inst Technol, Sch Flight, Anyang, Peoples R China;

    Japan Adv Inst Sci & Technol, Sch Knowledge Sci, Nomi, Ishikawa, Japan;

    Guangxi Univ Nationalities, Sch Business, Nanning, Peoples R China;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《生物学医学文摘》(MEDLINE);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    carbon emission reduction; low-carbon promotion; cooperative structure; closed-loop supply chain;

    机译:碳减排;低碳促进;合作结构;闭环供应链;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号