首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Pollution >Sorption and transport of aluminum dialkyl phosphinate flame retardants and their hydrolysates in soils
【24h】

Sorption and transport of aluminum dialkyl phosphinate flame retardants and their hydrolysates in soils

机译:次烷基次膦酸铝阻燃剂及其在土壤中的水解产物的吸附与迁移

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Aluminum dialkyl phosphinates (ADPs) are a class of promising phosphorus-containing flame retardants, but their environmental fate is not well understood. Sorption and transport behaviors of ADPs, and their hydrolysates dialkyl phosphinic acids (DPAs) were studied by batch and column experiments. ADP5 are less mobile in soil columns with more than half (52.6%) of ADPs retained in the soil and residues in the topmost 2-cm layer account for more than 57% of total residues. Dissolution and dispersion of fine grain ADPs were responsible for the transport of ADPs. Sorption DPAs (logK(oc)) was significantly related to the lipophilicity of DPAs (logD) (p 0.05). Soil pH and clay content were the dominant factors governing the sorption and transport of DPAs in soils, indicating the importance of electrostatic interactions. The retardation factors (R) of DPAs derived from leaching experiments were pH-dependent with larger R values in the acidic soil (pH = 4.0) where anionic and neutral species of DPAs coexisted. Both physical and chemical non-equilibrium convection-dispersion equations (CDE) yield appropriate modeling for DPAs transport. In most cases, R values estimated from column tests differed from those derived from the batch experiments, which might be attributed to non-equilibrium sorption processes in dynamic conditions. (C) 2018 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
机译:二烷基次膦酸铝(ADP)是一类有前途的含磷阻燃剂,但对它们的环境命运知之甚少。通过分批和柱实验研究了ADP及其水解产物二烷基次膦酸(DPA)的吸附和运输行为。 ADP5在土壤柱中的流动性较差,其中一半以上(> 52.6%)的ADP保留在土壤中,最顶层2厘米层的残留物占总残留物的57%以上。细颗粒ADP的溶解和分散是ADP运输的原因。吸附DPA(logK(oc))与DPA的亲脂性(logD)显着相关(p <0.05)。土壤pH和黏土含量是控制DPA在土壤中吸附和迁移的主要因素,表明静电相互作用的重要性。衍生自浸出实验的DPA的阻滞因子(R)是pH依赖性的,在DPA的阴离子和中性物质共存的酸性土壤中(pH = 4.0),R值较大。物理和化学非平衡对流扩散方程(CDE)均可为DPA的运输提供适当的模型。在大多数情况下,柱测试得出的R值不同于批处理实验得出的R值,这可能归因于动态条件下的非平衡吸附过程。 (C)2018由Elsevier Ltd.发布

著录项

  • 来源
    《Environmental Pollution》 |2019年第3期|1-10|共10页
  • 作者单位

    Chinese Acad Sci, Res Ctr Ecoenvironm Sci, State Key Lab Environm & Ecotoxicol, Beijing 100085, Peoples R China;

    Jianghan Univ, Minist Educ, Key Lab Optoelect Chem Mat & Devices, Wuhan 430056, Hubei, Peoples R China;

    Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China;

    Jianghan Univ, Inst Environm & Hlth, Wuhan 430056, Hubei, Peoples R China;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《生物学医学文摘》(MEDLINE);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Soil sorption; Soil transport; Aluminum dialkyl phosphinates (ADPs); Dialkyl phosphinic acids (DPAs); CXTFIT;

    机译:土壤吸附;土壤运输;二烷基次膦酸铝(ADP);二烷基次膦酸(DPA);CXTFIT;
  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 03:59:06

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号