首页> 外文期刊>Environmental and planning law journal >A comment on the draft report of the Productivity Commission's inquiry into the conservation of Australia's heritage places
【24h】

A comment on the draft report of the Productivity Commission's inquiry into the conservation of Australia's heritage places

机译:关于生产力委员会调查澳大利亚遗产保护地的报告草案的评论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In December 2005 the Productivity Commission released its draft report on the conservation of Australia's historic heritage places. The draft report advocated a number of significant changes to the current practices and procedures for heritage protection at local and national level. One of the draft report's primary recommendations was that the system of heritage listing by local governments should be amended so that an item could only be listed as an item of heritage if the owner of the item had entered into a voluntary conservation agreement with the local government authority concerned. Ignoring most of the submissions put before it by heritage based nongovernment organisations, the draft report rejected suggestions that there should be greater use of incentive or sanctions to preserve and protect items of historic heritage. Rather the recommendation focused on preserving the rights and interests of the property holder over society's interest in preserving items of historic heritage. The final report is due for release on 21 July 2006.
机译:2005年12月,生产力委员会发布了有关澳大利亚历史遗迹保护区的报告草稿。报告草案主张在地方和国家两级对当前的遗产保护实践和程序进行重大修改。报告草案的主要建议之一是,应修改地方政府的遗产名录制度,以使只有在遗产所有者与地方政府达成自愿保护协议的情况下,该遗产才可以列为遗产。有关当局。报告草稿忽略了以遗产为基础的非政府组织提交的大多数意见,拒绝了关于应该更多地使用激励或制裁措施来保存和保护历史遗产的建议。相反,该建议的重点是维护财产所有人的权利和利益,而不是社会对历史遗产的保护。最终报告应于2006年7月21日发布。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号