...
首页> 外文期刊>Environmental and planning law journal >Science hubris and insufficient legal safeguards
【24h】

Science hubris and insufficient legal safeguards

机译:科学自大和法律保障不足

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

In the pursuit of efficient natural resource governance, market instruments offer many benefits, so too science-informed regulation. However, there are unrecognised fundamental risks with power invested in property owners or technical experts to determine how best natural resources are to be governed. In this article the authors discuss some recent developments in science and property based resource governance in water management in Australia as an illustration of more pervasive developments around the world. The authors suggest that while it is important to take advantage of innovations that can improve the effectiveness and efficiency of natural resource governance, it is no less important to create mechanisms to guard against the hubris that can be tacitly embedded. Such hubris has implications for the human rights of users and stewards of the environment, particularly Indigenous and rural communities, whose economic and educational disadvantages can be compounded by institutionalisation of particular forms of privilege.
机译:在追求有效的自然资源治理中,市场手段提供了许多好处,科学知情的监管也是如此。但是,通过投资于业主或技术专家来确定如何管理最佳自然资源,存在无法识别的基本风险。在本文中,作者讨论了澳大利亚水资源管理中基于科学和财产的资源治理方面的最新进展,以说明世界范围内更普遍的发展。作者认为,尽管利用可以提高自然资源治理的有效性和效率的创新很重要,但建立防止隐性嵌入的狂妄自大的机制也同样重要。这种傲慢行为对环境使用者和环境管理者的人权产生影响,特别是土著和农村社区,其经济和教育劣势可以通过特殊形式的特权制度化而加重。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Environmental and planning law journal》 |2014年第4期|311-326|共16页
  • 作者单位

    Australian Centre for Agriculture and Law, Deputy Head of School of Law, University of New England;

    Australian Centre for Agriculture and Law, University of New England;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号