首页> 外文期刊>Environmental and planning law journal >Restorative justice intervention in a planning law context: Is the 'amber light' approach to merit determination restorative?
【24h】

Restorative justice intervention in a planning law context: Is the 'amber light' approach to merit determination restorative?

机译:规划法律背景下的恢复性司法干预:择优决定的“琥珀色”方法是否具有恢复性?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Restorative justice is a multifaceted concept which has been utilised in a number of settings. Even though, as yet, New South Wales environmental and planning law has not followed the impressive lead provided by Australia's New Zealand neighbours in the use of restorative justice in that context, a restorative justice conference was held following the destruction of an Aboriginal cultural heritage object and place. Class 1 planning appeals before the New South Wales Land and Environment Court are evolutionary in nature with the "amber light" approach to merit determination facilitating amendments to development proposals in response to community, consent authority and court concerns. This article argues that the amber light approach to merit determination is restorative.
机译:恢复性司法是一个多方面的概念,已在许多场合得到运用。尽管到目前为止,新南威尔士州的环境和规划法尚未遵循澳大利亚新西兰邻国在这方面使用恢复性司法所提供的令人印象深刻的领导作用,但在土著文化遗产客体被毁后仍举行了恢复性司法会议。和地方。新南威尔士州土地与环境法院向一级法院提出的计划上诉是具有演化性的,采用“琥珀色”的择优决定方法,有利于响应社区,同意权和法院的关注对发展建议进行修订。本文认为,采用琥珀色光进行择优决定具有恢复性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号