首页> 外文期刊>Environmental and planning law journal >Restorative Justice Intervention in an Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Protection Context: Chief Executive, Office of Environment and Heritage v Clarence Valley Council
【24h】

Restorative Justice Intervention in an Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Protection Context: Chief Executive, Office of Environment and Heritage v Clarence Valley Council

机译:在原住民文化遗产保护背景下进行恢复性司法干预:环境与遗产办公室首席执行官v克拉伦斯谷议会

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Disturbance, damage and destruction of Aboriginal cultural heritage can cause much harm to Aboriginal people and their communities. Restorative justice conferencing as part of the prosecution of Aboriginal cultural heritage offending has the potential to repair the harm occasioned by such offending. This article will demonstrate how the repair of harm can be achieved through conferencing fulfilling four functions - communication, education, resolution and reintegration. It will do so having regard to the recent prosecution of Chief Executive, Office of Environment and Heritage v Clarence Valley Council for Aboriginal cultural heritage offending; a prosecution in which restorative justice conferencing was utilised.
机译:土著文化遗产的扰乱,破坏和破坏可能对土著人民及其社区造成很大伤害。恢复性司法会议是起诉土著文化遗产犯罪的一部分,有可能修复此类犯罪造成的损害。本文将演示如何通过会议履行沟通,教育,解决和重新融合四个职能来实现对损害的补救。鉴于最近对环境和遗产办公室行政长官诉克拉伦斯河谷理事会对土著文化遗产犯罪的起诉,法院将这样做;进行恢复性司法会议的起诉。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号