...
首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Monitoring and Assessment >Noise tolerance of algorithms for estimating chlorophyll a concentration in turbid waters
【24h】

Noise tolerance of algorithms for estimating chlorophyll a concentration in turbid waters

机译:估算浑浊水中叶绿素a浓度的算法的噪声耐受性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The accuracy and noise tolerance of 13 global models and 5 Case II chlorophyll a (chl a) retrieval models were evaluated using three dataset. It was found that if 5 % input noise related to atmospheric correction is considered, then the uncertainty associated with noise tolerance varied from 5.5 % to 55.6 %, and these uncertainties generally accounts for 15.63 % to 24.75 % of the total uncertainty. This observation suggests that an optimal algorithm not only should have a strong chl a concentration prediction ability but also should possess high insensitivity to the noise of remote-sensing imagery. The accuracy evaluations of chl a models were based on comparisons of chl a predicted models with chl a concentration measured analytically for field measurements. The results indicate that none of the selected chl a estimation algorithms provide accurate retrievals of chl a in turbid waters. This may be attributed to the strong optical influence of organic and inorganic matter at the blue green range, and the non-negligible of non-organic matter absorption at the red and near-infrared ranges. In order to solve this problem, the chl a concentration retrieval models must be further optimized. After being optimized using the empirical optimized method constructed in this paper, a single parameterized NDCI (normalized difference chl a index) model produces accurate retrievals in the Yellow River Estuary, Taihu Lake and Chesapeake Bay. If 5 % input noise associated with residual uncertainty Oof atmospheric correction is taken into account, the model produces only 29.96 % uncertainty for the remote sensing of chl a concentration in these three turbid waters.
机译:使用三个数据集评估了13个全局模型和5个Case II叶绿素a(chla)检索模型的准确性和噪声耐受性。发现如果考虑与大气校正有关的5%输入噪声,则与噪声容忍度相关的不确定性在5.5%至55.6%之间变化,这些不确定性通常占总不确定性的15.63%至24.75%。该观察结果表明,最佳算法不仅应具有较强的浓度预测能力,而且还应对遥感影像的噪声具有高度的不敏感性。 chl a模型的准确性评估基于chl a预测模型与为现场测量分析性测得的chl a浓度的比较。结果表明,所选的chl a估计算法均无法在浑浊的水中准确提取chl a。这可能归因于蓝绿色范围内有机和无机物质的强烈光学影响,以及红色和近红外范围内不可忽略的非有机物质吸收。为了解决这个问题,必须进一步优化chl a浓度检索模型。在使用本文构建的经验优化方法进行优化之后,单个参数化NDCI(归一化差值指标)模型可以在黄河口,太湖和切萨皮克湾进行准确的反演。如果考虑到与大气校正的残余不确定度Oof相关的5%输入噪声,则该模型仅产生29.96%的不确定性,用于遥感这三种混浊水域中的chl a浓度。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Environmental Monitoring and Assessment》 |2014年第4期|2297-2311|共15页
  • 作者

    Jun Chen;

  • 作者单位

    School of Ocean Sciences, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China The Key Laboratory of Marine Hydrocarbon Resources and Environmental Geology, Qingdao Institute of Marine Geology, Qingdao 266071, China;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Remote sensing; Chlorophyll a concentration; Noise tolerance; Turbid waters;

    机译:遥感;叶绿素a浓度;噪音容忍度浑浊的水域;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号