首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Monitoring and Assessment >Evaluation of an alternate method for sampling benthic macroinvertebrates in low-gradient streams sampled as part of the National Rivers and Streams Assessment
【24h】

Evaluation of an alternate method for sampling benthic macroinvertebrates in low-gradient streams sampled as part of the National Rivers and Streams Assessment

机译:评价作为国家河流和溪流评估一部分的低坡度溪流中底栖大型无脊椎动物取样方法的评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Benthic macroinvertebrates are sampled in streams and rivers as one of the assessment elements of the US Environmental Protection Agency's National Rivers and Streams Assessment. In a 2006 report, the recommendation was made that different yet comparable methods be evaluated for different types of streams (e.g., low gradient vs. high gradient). Consequently, a research element was added to the 2008-2009 National Rivers and Streams Assessment to conduct a side-by-side comparison of the standard macroinvertebrate sampling method with an alternate method specifically designed for low-gradient wadeable streams and rivers that focused more on stream edge habitat. Samples were collected using each method at 525 sites in five of nine aggregate ecoregions located in the conterminous USA. Methods were compared using the benthic macroinvertebrate multimetric index developed for the 2006 Wadeable Streams Assessment. Statistical analysis did not reveal any trends that would suggest the overall assessment of low-gradient streams on a regional or national scale would change if the alternate method was used rather than the standard sampling method, regardless of the gradient cutoff used to define low-gradient streams. Based on these results, the National Rivers and Streams Survey should continue to use the standard field method for sampling all streams.
机译:底栖大型无脊椎动物在河流中取样,作为美国环境保护署国家河流与河流评估的评估要素之一。在2006年的一份报告中,建议针对不同类型的流(例如,低梯度与高梯度)评估不同但可比较的方法。因此,在2008-2009年美国国家河流和河流评估中增加了一个研究元素,以对标准大型无脊椎动物采样方法与专门为低梯度可涉河流和河流特别设计的替代方法进行并排比较。流边缘栖息地。使用每种方法,在位于美国本土的9个聚集生态区中的5个中的525个地点收集了样本。使用为2006年Wadeable Streams评估开发的底栖大型无脊椎动物多指标对方法进行了比较。统计分析并未发现任何趋势,表明如果使用替代方法而不是标准采样方法,则无论用于定义低梯度的梯度临界值如何,对区域或国家范围内的低梯度流的总体评估都将发生变化。流。基于这些结果,国家河流和河流调查应继续使用标准现场方法对所有河流进行采样。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号