Correction to: Surveying the arable plant diversity of conventionally managed farmland: a comparison of methods

Wietzke Alexander; Leuschner Christoph

首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Monitoring and Assessment >Correction to: Surveying the arable plant diversity of conventionally managed farmland: a comparison of methods

【24h】

Correction to: Surveying the arable plant diversity of conventionally managed farmland: a comparison of methods

机译：纠正：调查传统管理农田的耕种植物多样性：方法比较

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

掌桥外文数据库（机构版） >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

文献代查 >>

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

A correction to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-021-08940-3

机译：对本文的修正已发布：https://doi.org/10.1007/S10661-021-08940-3

著录项

来源
《Environmental Monitoring and Assessment》 |2021年第4期|171.1-171.4|共4页
作者
Wietzke Alexander; Leuschner Christoph;
展开▼
作者单位

Univ Goettingen Dept Plant Ecol & Ecosyst Res Untere Karspule 2 D-37073 Gottingen Germany;

Univ Goettingen Dept Plant Ecol & Ecosyst Res Untere Karspule 2 D-37073 Gottingen Germany;

展开▼
收录信息美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 eng
中图分类
关键词

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. Correction to: Surveying the arable plant diversity of conventionally managed farmland: a comparison of methods [J] . Wietzke Alexander, Leuschner Christoph Environmental Monitoring and Assessment . 2020,第7期

机译：纠正：调查常规管理农田的耕种植物多样性：方法比较方法
2. Surveying the arable plant diversity of conventionally managed farmland: a comparison of methods [J] . Wietzke Alexander, Leuschner Christoph Environmental Monitoring and Assessment . 2020,第2期

机译：常规管理耕地耕地植物多样性调查：方法比较
3. The arable plant diversity of intensively managed farmland: effects of field position and crop type at local and landscape scales. (Special Issue: Landscape ecology and biodiversity in agricultural landscapes.) [J] . Poggio S. L., Chaneton E. J., Ghersa C. M. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment: An International Journal for Scientific Research on the Relationship of Agriculture and Food Production to the Biosphere . 2013,第Null期

机译：集约化管理耕地的可耕植物多样性：田间位置和作物类型对当地和景观尺度的影响。（特刊：农业景观中的景观生态学和生物多样性。）
4. Comparison of Maximum-Likelihood Image and Wavefront Reconstruction using Conventional Image, Phase Diversity, and Lenslet Diversity Data [C] . David Gerwe, Jim Stone, Carlos Luna, Unconventional Imaging II . 2006

机译：使用常规图像，相位分集和小透镜分集数据比较最大似然图像和波前重建
5. A comparison study of the uninsured, smoking status and obesity rates using two different survey methods: Telephone survey and face-to-face survey. [D] . Greene, Christine J. 2006

机译：使用两种不同的调查方法对未保险，吸烟状况和肥胖率进行比较研究：电话调查和面对面调查。
6. Two Bee-Pollinated Plant Species Show Higher Seed Production when Grown in Gardens Compared to Arable Farmland [O] . John Cussans, David Goulson, Roy Sanderson, 2010

机译：与可耕地相比在花园中种植的两种蜜蜂授粉植物种的种子产量更高
7. Direct and indirect methods comparison in generation of orthophotos and digital terrain models based in topographic and conventional photogrammetry survey with no metric cameras in the plant wastewater treatment of Valledupar [O] . Molina Leguizamón Fabian Yesid, Corredor Rivera Jorge Luis 2015

机译：在地形和常规摄影测量中生成正射影像和数字地形模型的直接和间接方法比较，在巴耶杜帕尔的植物废水处理中没有公制相机
8. Guidelines for the verification and validation of expert system software and conventional software: Survey and assessment of conventional software verification and validation methods. Volume 2 [R] . 1995

机译：专家系统软件和传统软件的验证和确认指南：传统软件验证和验证方法的调查和评估。第2卷

Correction to: Surveying the arable plant diversity of conventionally managed farmland: a comparison of methods

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅