首页> 外文期刊>Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment: An International Journal for Scientific Research on the Relationship of Agriculture and Food Production to the Biosphere >The arable plant diversity of intensively managed farmland: effects of field position and crop type at local and landscape scales. (Special Issue: Landscape ecology and biodiversity in agricultural landscapes.)
【24h】

The arable plant diversity of intensively managed farmland: effects of field position and crop type at local and landscape scales. (Special Issue: Landscape ecology and biodiversity in agricultural landscapes.)

机译:集约化管理耕地的可耕植物多样性:田间位置和作物类型对当地和景观尺度的影响。 (特刊:农业景观中的景观生态学和生物多样性。)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Agro-ecosystem biodiversity is threatened by increasing spatial homogenisation of intensively managed farmland. Yet current understanding of patterns of arable plant diversity at various scales remains limited. We evaluated the extent to which species richness of arable plants in the Rolling Pampas of Argentina is determined by field position (fencerow, edge and centre) and crop type, at both field (local) and landscape scales. Plant richness was assessed in maize, soybean and wheat-soybean fields across four landscape types differing in spatial complexity, as defined by percentage area devoted to cropland. Species richness was hierarchically nested within landscape types, field positions and crop types. Landscape richness ( gamma -diversity, the cumulative number of species in a set of fields) was additively partitioned into two components, one for local richness ( alpha -diversity, the mean number of species per field) and one denoting differences in species composition among fields ( beta -diversity, where beta = gamma - alpha ). Field position was the main determinant of landscape-scale plant richness. Overall, gamma -diversity declined from fencerows, through field edges to field centres, but was unaffected by crop type. Spatial variation in species composition ( beta -diversity), rather than species packing within fields ( alpha -diversity), accounted for most of the variation in arable gamma -diversity. Higher beta -diversity in field edges than in field centres suggested that propagule dispersal from fencerow vegetation may create a 'mass effect' onto certain crop types. Shifts in gamma -diversity of major perennial life-forms (chamaeophytes and phanerophytes) between field positions and crop types reflected the contrasting disturbance regimes affecting plant communities of fencerows and cultivated fields. Our results indicate that preserving coherent and extensive fencerow networks is essential to conserve farmland biodiversity. Moreover, maintaining landscape heterogeneity to support elevated beta -diversities of arable plants requires cropping systems that promote crop diversity in both space and time.Digital Object Identifier http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2012.01.013
机译:集约化管理耕地的空间同质化日益加剧,农业生态系统生物多样性受到威胁。然而,目前对各种规模的可耕种植物多样性模式的了解仍然有限。我们评估了田野位置(篱笆,边缘和中部)和作物类型(在田间(本地)和景观尺度上)在何种程度上决定了阿根廷滚动潘帕斯州耕地植物的物种丰富度。在玉米,大豆和小麦-大豆田中,对四种景观类型的植物丰富度进行了评估,这些景观类型的空间复杂度不同,这取决于耕地面积百分比。物种丰富度分层嵌套在景观类型,田间位置和作物类型中。景观丰富度(γ多样性,一组田地中物种的累积数量)被累加分为两个部分,一个是局部丰富性(α多样性,每个田地中物种的平均数目),一个是物种多样性之间的差异。字段(beta -diversity,其中beta = gamma-alpha)。田间位置是景观植物丰富度的主要决定因素。总体而言,伽马多样性从篱笆墙,通过田间边缘到田间中心有所下降,但不受作物类型的影响。物种构成的空间变化(β-多样性)而不是田间物种堆积(α-多样性)是造成耕地γ-多样性变化的主要原因。田间边缘的β多样性高于田间中心,这表明篱笆植被的繁殖扩散可能会对某些作物类型产生“质量效应”。田间位置和作物类型之间主要多年生生命形式(沙生植物和幽门植物)的γ-多样性变化反映了影响篱笆和耕地植物群落的不同干扰机制。我们的结果表明,保持连贯和广泛的篱笆网络对于保护农田生物多样性至关重要。此外,保持景观异质性以支持可耕植物的β多样性升高,需要能够在时空上促进作物多样性的种植系统。数字对象标识符http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2012.01.013

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号