...
【24h】

Non-PFOS fume suppressants

机译:非全氟辛烷磺酸烟雾抑制剂

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In September 2012, following its RTR of the NESHAP for chromium electroplating and anodizing, the EPA issued revised regulations for the sector, which included a phaseout of the use of perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS) in wetting agent fume suppressants (WAFSs) used in plating baths. The RTR rule allows a 3-year compliance period-until September 21, 2015-for existing sources to eliminate the use of PFOS WAFSs. Facilities can also apply for a 1-year extension to achieve compliance.Chromium plating organizations have expressed concern about the phaseout, particularly as it affects small electropolaters that rely more on fume suppressants to reduce the surface tension of their baths, thereby lowering chromium emissions, than large facilities that rely more on emissions control equipment. The core of their complaint is that the non-PFOS WAFSs the EPA is advocating are not sufficiently effective in lowering chromium emissions, will cost significantly more than PFOS WAFSs, and will even compromise the plating process.
机译:2012年9月,在对NESHAP进行铬电镀和阳极氧化的RTR批准之后,EPA颁布了该行业的修订法规,其中包括逐步淘汰在电镀中使用的全氟辛烷磺酸(PFOS)润湿剂消烟剂(WAFS)中浴室。 RTR规则允许现有来源的合规期限为3年,直到2015年9月21日,以消除对PFOS WAFS的使用。设施也可以申请1年延期以达到法规要求。铬镀层组织已对淘汰问题表示关注,特别是因为它会影响那些更依赖于烟气抑制剂以降低镀液表面张力从而降低铬排放量的小型电沉积物,而不是更多地依赖排放控制设备的大型设施。他们抱怨的核心是,EPA倡导的非全氟辛烷磺酸WAFS在降低铬的排放方面不够有效,其成本要比全氟辛烷磺酸WAFS高得多,甚至会损害电镀工艺。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号