首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Management >Communal Participation in Payment for Environmental Services (PES): Unpacking the Collective Decision to Enroll
【24h】

Communal Participation in Payment for Environmental Services (PES): Unpacking the Collective Decision to Enroll

机译:社区参与环境服务付款(PES):拆开集体注册决定

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Payment for Environmental Service programs are increasingly applied in communal settings where resource users collectively join the program and agree to limit their shared use of a common-property resource. Who decides to join PES and the degree to which community members agree with the collective decision is critical for the success of said programs. Yet, we have limited understanding of the factors that influence communal participation and the collective decision process. This paper examines communal participation in a national payment for conservation program in Ecuador. We use quantitative and qualitative analysis to (i) identify the attributes of the communities that participate (or not), and factors that facilitate participation (n = 67), and (ii) assess household preference and alignment with the collective decision to participate (n = 212). Household participation preferences indicate varying degrees of consensus with the collective decision to participate, with those using the resource less likely to support participation. At the communal level, however, our results indicate that over time, those communities that depend more heavily on their resource systems may ultimately choose to participate. Our findings suggest that communal governance structures and outside organizations may be instrumental in gaining participation in resource-dependent communities and building consensus. Findings also point to the need for further research on communal decision-processes to ensure that the collective decision is based on an informed and democratic process.
机译:环境服务计划的付款越来越多地应用于公共场所,在这种公共场所中,资源用户共同加入了该计划,并同意限制他们对共同财产资源的共享使用。谁决定加入PES,社区成员在多大程度上同意集体决策对于上述计划的成功至关重要。但是,我们对影响社区参与和集体决策过程的因素了解有限。本文研究了厄瓜多尔的社区参与国家支付保护计划的情况。我们使用定量和定性分析来(i)确定参与(或不参与)的社区的属性,以及促进参与的因素(n = 67),以及(ii)评估家庭的偏好和是否与参与的集体决策保持一致( n = 212)。家庭参与偏好显示出人们对集体参与决策的不同程度的共识,而那些使用资源的人则不太可能支持参与。但是,在社区一级,我们的结果表明,随着时间的流逝,那些更加依赖其资源系统的社区最终可能会选择参与。我们的发现表明,公共治理结构和外部组织可能有助于获得资源依赖型社区的参与并建立共识。研究结果还指出,有必要对公共决策过程进行进一步研究,以确保集体决策基于知情和民主的过程。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Environmental Management》 |2017年第6期|939-955|共17页
  • 作者

    Felipe Murtinho; Tanya Hayes;

  • 作者单位

    International Studies and Institute of Public Service, Seattle University, 901 12th Ave, Seattle, WA 98122, USA;

    Institute of Public Service and Environmental Studies, Seattle University, 901 12th Ave, Seattle, WA 98122, USA;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Collective action; Conservation; Common-pool resource; Ecosystem services; Latin America; Páramo;

    机译:集体行动;保护;公共游泳池资源;生态系统服务;拉丁美洲;帕拉莫;
  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 13:25:23

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号