首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Management >Assessing Landowner Activities Related to Birds Across Rural-to-Urban Landscapes
【24h】

Assessing Landowner Activities Related to Birds Across Rural-to-Urban Landscapes

机译:评估农村到城市景观中与鸟类有关的土地所有者活动

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Fluctuations of bird abundances in the Midwest region of the United States have been attributed to such factors as landscape change, habitat fragmentation, depredation, and supplemental feeding. However, no attempt has been made to estimate the collective role of landowner activities that may influence birds across a landscape. To investigate how landowners might influence birds when the majority (> 90%) of land is privately owned, we surveyed all 1694 private domestic landowners living on three breeding bird survey routes (~120 km) that represent a continuum of rural-to-urban landscapes in Southeastern Michigan from October through December 2000. Our survey was designed to investigate (1) the proportion of landowners involved in bird feeding, providing bird houses, planting or maintaining vegetation for birds, gardening, landscaping, applying fertilizer, and applying pesticides or herbicides; (2) whether differences existed between urban, suburban, and rural landowner activities; and (3) whether landowners that carried out a given activity were sociodemographically different from those who did not. Of the 968 respondents (58.5% response rate), 912 (94%) carried out at least one of the activities on their land and the average landowner carried out 3.7 activities. A total of 65.6% fed birds, 45.7% provided bird houses, 54.6% planted or maintained vegetation for birds, 72.7% gardened, 72.3% landscaped, 49.3% applied fertilizer, and 25.2% applied pesticides or herbicides. Significant differences existed between the landscapes, with rural landowners having more bird houses and applying pesticides or herbicides in greater frequency. Similarly, urban landowners had a greater density of bird feeders and houses, but planted or maintained vegetation in the lowest frequency. Participation in activities varied by demographic factors, such as age, gender, and occupation. Scaling each activity to all landowners, including nonrespondents, across all landscapes indicates that between 14% and 82% of landowners may be engaged in a particular activity, with application of pesticides or herbicides having the least potential involvement (13.9%–55.4%) and gardening having the greatest potential involvement (40.1%–81.6%). Taken collectively, our results indicate that landowners are both intentionally and unintentionally engaged in a wide range of activities that are likely to influence bird populations.
机译:美国中西部地区鸟类丰度的波动归因于景观变化,栖息地破碎,掠夺和补充喂养等因素。但是,尚未尝试评估可能影响整个景观鸟类的土地所有者活动的集体作用。为了调查当大部分土地(> 90%)为私有时土地所有者如何影响鸟类,我们调查了生活在代表从农村到城市的连续性的三个繁殖鸟类调查路线(〜120公里)上的全部1694个私人家庭土地所有者2000年10月至2000年12月在密歇根州东南部的景观。我们的调查旨在调查(1)土地所有者参与鸟类饲养,提供鸟类房屋,为鸟类种植或维护植物,园艺,美化环境,施用肥料以及使用农药或农药的比例。除草剂(2)城市,郊区和农村土地所有者活动之间是否存在差异; (3)进行特定活动的土地所有者在社会人口统计学上与未进行土地所有者的区别。在968名受访者中(答复率为58.5%),其中912名(94%)在他们的土地上进行了至少一项活动,而平均地主进行了3.7项活动。共有65.6%的喂食鸟类,45.7%的鸟类提供禽舍,54.6%的鸟类种植或维持的植被,72.7%的园艺,72.3%的园林绿化,49.3%的肥料和25.2%的农药或除草剂。景观之间存在显着差异,农村土地所有者拥有更多的禽舍,并以更高的频率施用农药或除草剂。同样,城市地主的鸟类饲养者和房屋密度较高,但以最低的频率种植或维持植被。参与活动因人口因素(例如年龄,性别和职业)而异。将所有活动的规模扩展到所有景观的所有土地所有者,包括非受访者,表明可能有14%至82%的土地所有者从事特定活动,其中农药或除草剂的使用最少(13.9%-55.4%),并且从事园艺活动的可能性最大(40.1%–81.6%)。总体而言,我们的结果表明,土地所有者有意和无意地参与了可能影响鸟类种群的广泛活动。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号