...
首页> 外文期刊>Environmental law >PLAYING WITHOUT ACES: OFFSETS AND THE LIMITS OF FLEXIBILITY UNDER CLEAN AIR ACT CLIMATE POLICY
【24h】

PLAYING WITHOUT ACES: OFFSETS AND THE LIMITS OF FLEXIBILITY UNDER CLEAN AIR ACT CLIMATE POLICY

机译:不打王牌游戏:清洁空气法案气候政策下的偏差和灵活性限制

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) continues to move ahead with regulation of greenhouse gas emissions under the Clean Air Act (CAA). Previous work has indicated that basic forms of compliance flexibility-trading-appear to be legally permissible under section III of the CAA. This Article takes a close look at more expansive and ambitious types of flexibility: trading between different kinds of sources, biomass co-firing, and above all, offsets. It concludes that most types of such extended flexibility are either legally incompatible with the CAA, or so legally problematic that EPA is unlikely to adopt them. This has important implications for both the costs of the CAA climate policy and the level of environmental benefits that are achievable. It also creates tension between the CAA climate policy and state-level policies, such as California's, that aim to include various forms of extended flexibility.
机译:美国环境保护局(EPA)继续根据《清洁空气法》(CAA)规范温室气体排放。先前的工作表明,CAA第三节在法律上允许遵循合规灵活性交易的基本形式。本文仔细研究了更为广泛和雄心勃勃的灵活性类型:不同种类的源之间的交易,生物质共烧,尤其是抵消。结论是,这种扩展的灵活性的大多数类型要么在法律上与CAA不兼容,要么在法律上存在问题,以致EPA不太可能采用它们。这对CAA气候政策的成本和可实现的环境效益水平都具有重要意义。它还在CAA气候政策和州级政策(例如加利福尼亚州的政策)之间造成了紧张,这些政策旨在包括各种形式的扩展灵活性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号