...
首页> 外文期刊>The Environmental Law Reporter >The Case for the Carbon Tax: How to Overcome Politics and Find Our Green Destiny
【24h】

The Case for the Carbon Tax: How to Overcome Politics and Find Our Green Destiny

机译:碳税的案例:如何克服政治并找到我们的绿色命运

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

A federal carbon tax is the best choice for controlling GHG emissions. A carbon tax is simpler, more transparent, and more effective than a carbon cap-and-trade system. Australian tax expert David Russell favors a carbon tax, claiming that it is predictable, gradual, and could be easily implemented. Russell also asserts that GHG emissions trading could turn out to be the costliest public mistake in human history.i hope, for the sake of those countries and regions that have already invested in GHG trading programs, that he is incorrect in his latter assumption. The United States has the opportunity to make the right decision first. It's time that we unlearn the lesson of the former senator (Democrat) from Minnesota, Walter Mondale, who famously said: "Mr. Reagan will raise taxes; and so will I. He won't tell you. I just did." Former Senator Mondale lost to Ronald Reagan in a landslide, and no other U.S. politician has ever dared to admit that he or she would raise taxes.119 His words are still the truth: a carbon cap-and-rntrade system would increase energy costs-like a tax-the advocates just won't tell you so.rnA carbon tax doesn't need to increase overall taxes, because it can be recycled. Choosing a carbon tax will level the playing field and send a clear price signal throughout the economy without picking winners. It limits the opportunities for rent-seeking and fraud that lurk in the complexity of a cap-and-trade system. A carbon tax taxes bads, not goods. It creates incentives to try various means of GHG reductions: conservation; efficiency; and renewable energy. It creates incentives to buy sustainably produced local goods. It discourages the global market from using cheap labor (by making transport of goods more expensive), and encourages a global market in ideas. In a recent column, Friedman wrote the following:rnMany people will tell [President-elect] Obama that taxing carbon . . . now is a "non-starter." Wrong. It is the only starter. It is the game-changer.rnA carbon tax can best help us achieve our green destiny. We should do it, now.
机译:联邦碳税是控制温室气体排放的最佳选择。碳税比碳限额和交易制度更简单,更透明,更有效。澳大利亚税务专家戴维·罗素(David Russell)主张征收碳税,因为碳税是可预测的,渐进的并且易于实施。罗素还断言,温室气体排放交易可能是人类历史上最昂贵的公共错误。我希望,对于那些已经投资了温室气体交易计划的国家和地区,他在后一种假设中是错误的。美国有机会首先做出正确的决定。现在该是我们从明尼苏达州前参议员(民主党)沃尔特·蒙代尔(Walter Mondale)那里吸取教训的时候了,他著名地说:“里根先生将提高税收;我也将提高税收。他不会告诉你。我只是这样做。”前参议员蒙代尔(Mondale)在一次滑坡中输给了罗纳德·里根(Ronald Reagan),没有其他美国政客敢于承认他或她会加税。119他的话仍然是事实:碳限制与交易制度会增加能源成本,就像税收一样,倡导者不会这样告诉你。碳税不需要增加整体税,因为它可以回收。选择碳税将公平竞争,并在整个经济中发出明确的价格信号,而不会选择赢家。它限制了在限额交易系统的复杂性中潜伏的寻租和欺诈机会。碳税对商品而非商品征收税款。它激励人们尝试各种减少温室气体的方法:保护;效率;和可再生能源。它刺激了人们购买可持续生产的当地商品。它不鼓励全球市场使用廉价劳动力(通过使货物运输更加昂贵),并鼓励全球思想市场。弗里德曼在最近的专栏中写道:•许多人会告诉[当选总统]奥巴马对碳征税。 。 。现在是“入门者”。错误。它是唯一的启动器。这是改变游戏规则的人。碳税可以最好地帮助我们实现我们的绿色命运。现在,我们应该这样做。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号