首页> 外文期刊>The Environmental Law Reporter >Minimum Size Restrictions Are a Problem for Fisheries, Is Litigation the Solution?
【24h】

Minimum Size Restrictions Are a Problem for Fisheries, Is Litigation the Solution?

机译:最小尺寸限制是渔业的问题,诉讼是否可以解决?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Fisheries management is a unique form of natural resource management because all stakeholders, in a way, want the same thing: sustainable fish populations. Yet, differing positions among stakeholders of how fish populations should be divided and managed mean that the odds are against a single effort removing minimum size restrictions. The complicated nature of the Magnuson-Stevens Act's regulatory framework and the prevalence of species-specific regulations mean thousands of rules would need to be changed. Moreover, litigation in the area has proven difficult for plaintiffs, with scientific rationales successfully changing the status quo only when "clear and convincing."
机译:渔业管理是自然资源管理的一种独特形式,因为所有利益相关者在某种程度上都希望拥有同一个东西:可持续的鱼类种群。但是,利益相关者在如何划分和管理鱼类种群方面持不同立场,这意味着消除最小规模限制的单一努力的可能性不大。 《马格努森-史蒂文斯法案》(Magnuson-Stevens Act)监管框架的复杂性以及特定物种法规的普遍存在,意味着数千条规则将需要更改。此外,事实证明,该地区的诉讼对原告人来说是困难的,只有在“明确而令人信服”的情况下,科学依据才能成功地改变现状。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号