首页> 外文期刊>Environmental forensics >Allocating remedial costs at a superfund site using risk magnitude, geographic information systems, and Monte Carlo analysis
【24h】

Allocating remedial costs at a superfund site using risk magnitude, geographic information systems, and Monte Carlo analysis

机译:使用风险幅度,地理信息系统和Monte Carlo分析分配超级义务网站的补救成本

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A method for allocating remediation costs among a number of potentially responsible parties (PRPs) was developed as part of a highly technical, complex Superfund litigation case involving a former hazardous waste disposal site located in the southern United States. The method was devised in response to questions from the U.S. district court regarding the volume and composition of wastes disposed, the "remedy drivers" (defined by the court as wastes or chemicals that most influenced the selection of the remedy), and the relationship between these factors and the various PRPs. A key element of the method was calculation of the Risk Magnitude, which was defined as the logarithm of the maximum concentration of a chemical in groundwater divided by its cleanup standard. Risk magnitude was linked to site remediation costs based on an analysis of remediation difficulty, data from remediation performance studies, and other sources. Key components of the allocation method included: (i) identifying remedy driver chemicals (RDCs) based on risk magnitude; (ii) quantifying the spatially adjusted cumulative risk magnitude associated with each RDC using a Geographic Information System (GIS); (iii) adjusting the risk magnitude to account for remediation difficulty of each RDC; (iv) correlating RDCs with the volume of different waste streams disposed by each PRP at the site; (v) developing an estimate for the waste volume for each PRP using multiple lines of evidence inside a Monte Carlo analysis; and (vi) apportioning final cleanup costs between PRPs based on their attributable volume and cumulative Risk Magnitude. The basic methodology was applied by the district court to develop a scientifically sound opinion that allocated site remediation costs between the PRPs-a decision that was upheld by the U.S. court of appeals. Though developed for a particular site, the method is adaptable, and its fundamental components could be applied to other sites where allocating remedial costs of complex chemical mixtures in environmental media is the objective.
机译:作为涉及位于美国南部的前危险废物处理遗址的高技术,复杂的超级诉讼案例的一部分,开发了一种涉及潜在责任方(PRPS)中的补救成本的方法。该方法针对来自美国地区法院的问题有关所处理废物的数量和组成的问题,“救助司机”(由法院定义为最严重影响补救措施的废物或化学物质),以及之间的关系这些因素和各种prps。该方法的一个关键要素是计算风险幅度,其被定义为地下水中的最大浓度的对数除以其清洁标准。基于对修复难度的分析,来自修复绩效研究和其他来源的数据,风险幅度与现场修复成本相关联。分配方法的关键组成部分包括:(i)根据风险幅度识别补救司司司司化学品(RDC); (ii)使用地理信息系统(GIS)量化与每个RDC相关的空间调整的累积风险幅度; (iii)调整风险幅度以考虑每个RDC的修复难度; (iv)将RDC与位点上的每个PRP的不同废物流的体积相关联; (v)在Monte Carlo分析中使用多条证据制定对每个PRP的废物量的估计; (vi)基于其归因于其可归体积和累积风险幅度在PRP之间分配最终清理成本。地区法院申请了基本方法,制定科学的舆论,即在美国上诉法院驻扎的PROS-A决定之间分配了现场修复成本。虽然为特定部位开发,但该方法适用,其基本组件可以应用于其他网站,其中在环境介质中分配复杂化学混合物的补救成本是目标。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号