首页> 外文期刊>Environmental ethics >Against Ecological Sovereignty: Ethics, Biopolitics, and Saving the Natural World
【24h】

Against Ecological Sovereignty: Ethics, Biopolitics, and Saving the Natural World

机译:反对生态主权:伦理,生物政治与拯救自然世界

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This is a difficult, even daunting, book. I mean yet no criticism, for its difficulty is partly a function of our paralysis in the face of two related nightmares. The first features a danger more unsettling, if not as urgently immanent: that "everywhere sovereignty declares nature free, it is already in chains" (p. (ⅫⅠ)). The very act of setting aside land to preserve it from exploitation-and what ecologically sensitive person could object to that?-presumes the prior right of humans to dispose over nature, to determine what may be done with it. Our right to make an exception proves the existence of the rule-i.e., of the sovereignty over nature against which Smith declares himself in his title. The second nightmare features a danger less disconcerting, but politically more immanent. Hitherto the powerful have fought recognition of climate change, but they will eventually face inescapable facts. Yet their acknowledgement, so long delayed, may not arrive as good news: for "the very powers implicated in bringing that crisis about" may find in it "the latest and most comprehensive justification for a political state of emergency"-a state that, once declared, will "legitimate yet further technocratic interventions, to further extend the state and corporate management of biological life,... and to stifle ecological politics as such" (pp. (ⅩⅥ)-(ⅩⅦ)).
机译:这是一本困难甚至艰巨的书。我的意思是还没有批评,因为它的困难部分是我们面对两次相关的噩梦而瘫痪的原因。第一个特征是危险,即使不是那么紧急的情况,也更加令人不安:“主权宣告无处无处,它已经处于束缚之中”(第(Ⅻ)页)。预留土地以保护土地免受剥削的行为以及具有生态敏感性的人会反对该行为的行为,是假定人类有优先处置自然的权利,以确定可以采取何种行动。我们提出例外的权利证明了规则的存在,即史密斯在其头衔中宣称对自然的主权。第二次恶梦的危险性不那么令人不安,但在政治上却更加内在。迄今为止,强国已与气候变化作斗争,但他们最终将面临不可避免的事实。然而,他们的承认,被拖延了很长时间,可能并不是一个好消息:因为“牵涉到这场危机中的非常强大的力量”可能会在其中找到“关于紧急状态的最新和最全面的理由”-一经宣布,将“采取合法的,进一步的官僚主义干预措施,以进一步扩展国家和企业对生物生活的管理,并扼杀生态政治本身”(第(ⅩⅥ)-(ⅩⅦ)页)。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Environmental ethics》 |2014年第2期|239-242|共4页
  • 作者

    W.S.K Cameron;

  • 作者单位

    Department of Philosophy, University Hall, Suite 3600, Loyola Marymount University, One LMU Drive, Los Angeles, CA 90045;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 00:03:52

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号